摘要
法院在审判涉及双重国籍的案件时,对当事人或者其他诉讼参与人国籍状态的审查有直接审查和附带审查两种方式,审查目的在于确定法院是否具有管辖权、诉讼主体是否适格、是否符合起诉条件、是否具有相应实体权利、是否需要适用外国法律。法院对双重国籍的审查具有正当性、合法性,同时亦需保持适当的行政尊重性。针对司法审查存在的同案不同判、类案不同判、说理不充分等问题,可以从强化能动司法、出台司法解释、公布指导案例、建设智慧法院着手,持续优化对双重国籍的审查路径。
When the court tries the cases involving dual nationality,the examination of the nationality status of the parties or other participants has two ways:direct examination and incidental examination.The purpose of the examination is to determine whether the court has jurisdiction,whether the subject of the litigation is qualified,whether it meets the conditions for prosecution,whether it has corresponding substantive rights,and whether it is necessary to apply foreign laws.The court's review of dual nationality should be legitimate and legal,while maintaining proper respect to administrative organs.In view of the problems of judicial review,such as different verdicts in the same case,different verdicts in different types of cases,and insufficient reasoning,we can continue to optimize the review path of dual nationality by strengthening active justice,issuing judicial interpretations,publishing guiding cases,and building smart courts,etc.
作者
林艺聪
周明
Lin Yicong;Zhou Ming(Zhejiang Police College,Hangzhou 310053,China;People's Public Security University of China,Beijing 100038,China)
出处
《湖北警官学院学报》
2024年第4期144-157,共14页
Journal of Hubei University of Police
关键词
双重国籍
司法审查
国籍认定
能动司法
Dual Nationality
Judicial Review
Nationality Recognition
Active Judiciary
