期刊文献+

大学外部评价的英国探索:卓越框架体系的形成、特征与发展趋势 被引量:3

British Exploration on University External Assessment:Formation,Characteristics and Trends of the Excellence Framework System
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来,英国在大学外部评价方面先后建立了"科研卓越框架""、教学卓越框架"以及"知识交换框架",以此形成了全方位评价大学的"卓越框架体系"。这一体系的基本特征包括政府机构与利益相关者反复磨合、定量技术与定性方法紧密结合、评价整体性与对象多样性相互融合以及简化大学事务与优化评价实施有效统合;同时其未来趋势表现为从政府主导评价走向多方利益平衡、从看重经济贡献走向考察社会影响、从强调促进竞争走向凸显质量提升、从各自独立发展走向协同配合演化。英国的相关探索可为我国完善大学外部评价提供借鉴。 recent years,the"Research Excellence Framework","Teaching Excellence Framework"and"Knowledge Exchange Framework"were established one by one in the UK.These frameworks has formed a excellence framework system for assessing British universities comprehensively which show some characteristics,including communicating repeatedly between the government and stakeholders,combining quantitatively technology closely with the qualitative method,mixing uniformity of evaluation and diversity of objects together,and balancing the simplification of the university affairs and the scientificity of assessment implementation effectively.At the same time,the framework system will develop from government-led evaluation to multi-benefit balance,from emphasizing economic contribution to examining social impact,from emphasizing promoting competition to highlighting quality improvement,and from independent development to collaborative evolution.The British exploration can give us inspiration on perfecting university external assessment.
作者 冯磊 马星 Feng Lei;Ma Xing(School of Education Science,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210097;Institute of Higher Education,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing 210044)
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第5期69-76,共8页 Research in Educational Development
基金 国家社会科学基金“十三五”规划2018年度教育学重点课题“加快‘双一流’建设的理论创新与实践路径研究(AAA180009)”部分成果。
关键词 大学评价 科研卓越框架 教学卓越框架 知识交换框架 英国 university assessment Research Excellence Framework Teaching Excellence Framework Knowledge Exchange Framework UK
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献29

  • 1李守福.论大学评价的价值取向[J].比较教育研究,2005,26(12):57-61. 被引量:16
  • 2湛毅青.英国政府对大学科研的资助体系[J].比较教育研究,2006,27(7):58-62. 被引量:11
  • 3沈红.1995年美国最好大学评估的新特征[J].高等教育研究,1996,17(2):85-91. 被引量:13
  • 4Malcolm Wicks, Science and Innovation : Making the Most of UK Research [ EB/OL ], http://www, berr. gov. uk/files/ file35789, pdf. 被引量:1
  • 5http ://www. hefce. ac. uk/pubs/year/2010/e1022010/. 被引量:1
  • 6HEFCE,RAE 2008 Accountability Review[ EB/OL], http ://www. hef- ce. ac. uk/data/year/2009/me2OOSaccountabihty review/. 被引量:1
  • 7OCLC, UK, Key Perspectives Ltd. 2009. A Comparative Review of Research Assessment Regimes in Five Countries and the Role of Libraries in the Research Assessment Process [ EB/OL ]. ht- tp://www, oclc. org/research/publications/library/2009/2009 - 09. pdf. 被引量:1
  • 8Lambert Review of Business - University Collaboration[ EB/OL], http://www, hm - treasury, gov. uk/d/lambertemergingissues_ 173. pdf. 被引量:1
  • 9HEFCE, Assessment Framework and Guidance on Submissions [ EB/OL ] , http ://www. ref. ac. uk/pubs/2011 - 02/. 被引量:1
  • 10The Allen Consulting Group,Measuring the Impact of Publicly Funded Research [ EB/OL ], http://www, dest. gov. att/NR/rdonlyres/ 6FB9F35B - FADD -44C2 - A15F - B145FF9416F6/1392/mport. pdf. 被引量:1

共引文献36

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部