期刊文献+

从声望排名到质量改进——美国博士生教育评估模式的演进 被引量:3

From Ranking to Quality Improvement——Evolution of Doctoral Education Assessment Methodology in America
原文传递
导出
摘要 自1924年首次实施博士生教育质量评估以来,美国博士生教育评估模式经历了以休格斯和肯尼斯顿为代表的声望研究、以美国教育委员会实施的两次质量评估为代表的客观指标研究和以全美研究委员会为代表的相关定量研究三个阶段。评估方法论的不断改进也意味着质量评估的目的从单纯的声望排名转向了真正的质量改进。 Since Raymond Hughes made the first doctoral program evaluation study in 1924, doctoral edu- cation assessment experienced three types of methodology: first type is reputational studies sponsored by Hughes and Hayward Keniston, second type is objective variables study sponsored by the American Council on Education, and third type is quantitative correlate studies sponsored by National Research Council. Methodology improvement implies that the aims of quality assessment has transformed from ranking to quality improvement.
作者 黄海刚
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期28-32,共5页 International and Comparative Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地北京师范大学比较教育研究中心2008年度重大项目"高等教育质量保证体系的国际比较研究"(项目编号:08JJD880235)的阶段性成果
关键词 美国 博士生教育 质量评估 评估模式 质量改进 doctoral education quality assessment methodology of evaluation quality improvement
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Lawrence,Judith K.,Kenneth C. Green. A Question of Quality: The Higher Education Ratings Game. AAHE-ERIC/Higher Education Research Report. Wash- ington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education, 1980. 被引量:1
  • 2Hayward Keniston.Graduate Study in Research in the Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press, 1959. 被引量:1
  • 3Allan M.Cartter.An Assessment of Quality in Graduate Education.Washington, D.C.:American Council on Education, 1966.3.5.7. 被引量:1
  • 4Roose, Kenneth D., Charles J. Andersen. A Rating of Graduate Programs.Washington, D.C.: The Amer- ican Council on Education, 1970.3.24. 被引量:1
  • 5David L.Tan.The Assessment of Quality in Higher Education: A Critical Review of the Literature and Research.Research in Higher Education, 1986 Vol.24, No. 3:223-265. 被引量:1
  • 6Marvin L. Goldberger, Brendan A. Maher, Pamela Ebert Flattau. Research Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change. Washington, D.C.:Nation- al Academy Press, 1995. 被引量:1
  • 7Jeremiah P. Ostriker, Charlotte V. Kuh, James A. Voytuk.A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctored Programs in the United States. Committee to Assess Re- search-Doctorate Programs .Washington, D.C.:The Na- tional Academies Press, 2010. 被引量:1
  • 8Jeremiah P. Ostriker, Paul W. Holland, Charlotte V. Kuh, James A.Voytuk.A Revised Guide to the Methodol- ogy of the Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States. Committee to Assess Re- search-Doctorate Programs. Washington, D.C.:The Na- tional Academies Press, 2010. 被引量:1

同被引文献61

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部