期刊文献+

微信视频教学在消化内镜护生临床带教中的应用 被引量:5

Application of WeChat video teaching mode in clinical teaching of digestive endoscopy nurses
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:研究微信视频教学法在消化内镜护生临床带教中的应用价值。方法:选取2018年1月至2020年6月在北京中医药大学附属重庆市中医院消化内镜科实习的126例护生为本研究教学对象;并将其随机分为对照组和实验组,每组63例;对照组采用传统教学,实验组采用传统教学结合微信视频教学。两组实习时间均为4周。比较两组实习结束后综合能力考核成绩,并采用批判性思维能力测量表、护生临床实习满意度量表评价两组教学前后实习护生评判性思维能力及满意度。采用SPSS 19.0统计软件对研究数据进行统计分析。连续变量以(均数±标准差)表示,采用 t检验;分类变量以百分比表示,采用四格表法检验。检验水准 α=0.05。 结果:实验组实习护生综合能力得分、理论知识及技能操作得分均显著高于对照组( P<0.05)。两组教学后实习护生寻找真相、开放思想、系统化能力、分析能力、求知欲、认知成熟度得分及总量表得分显著高于教学前( P<0.05),思维自信心得分与教学前比较,差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。实验组教学后实习护生寻找真相、开放思想、系统化能力、分析能力、求知欲、认知成熟度得分及总量表得分显著高于对照组( P<0.05),思维自信心得分与对照组比较差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。实验组实习管理、实习环境、教学内容、实习效果得分及总量表得分显著高于对照组( P<0.05),带教素质得分与对照组比较差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。 结论:消化内镜护生临床带教中应用微信视频教学法,能提高实习护生综合能力考核成绩及满意度,增强评判性思维能力。 Objective To study the application value of WeChat video teaching mode in clinical teaching of digestive endoscopy nurses.Methods The study selected 126 nursing trainees taking an internship in the Department of Gastroenterology in our hospital from January 2018 to June 2020 as the teaching objects,and they were randomized into two groups,Control Group and Experimental group,with 63 cases in each group.The control group adopted traditional teaching and the experimental group took traditional teaching combined with WeChat video teaching.The internship time of both groups was 4 weeks.The scores of comprehensive ability assessment after practice were compared between the two groups,and the critical thinking ability scale and nursing students'clinical practice satisfaction scale were used to evaluate the critical thinking ability and satisfaction of practice nurses of the two groups before and after teaching.SPSS 19.0 was used for statistical analysis of the research data.Continuous variables were expressed as(mean±standard deviation),t test was performed,categorical variables were expressed as percentage,four-grid test was conducted,and the test level wasα=0.05.Results The scores of comprehensive ability,theoretical knowledge and operation skills of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group(P<0.05).After teaching,the scores of seeking truth,opening mind,systematization ability,analytical ability,curiosity,cognitive maturity and total scale score of the two groups were significantly higher than those before teaching(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference in the score of thinking self-confidence before and after the teaching(P>0.05).The scores of seeking truth,opening mind,systematization ability,analytical ability,curiosity,cognitive maturity and total scale score of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference in the score of thinking self-confidence between the two groups(P>0.05).The
作者 冯银琼 肖怀芳 周培培 淦代容 卢德练 Feng Yinqiong;Xiao Huaifang;Zhou Peipei;Gan Dairong;Lu Delian(Department of Gastroenterology,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Chongqing 400021,China)
出处 《中华医学教育探索杂志》 2021年第4期492-496,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
关键词 微信 消化内镜科 护生 临床实习 WeChat Department of gastrointestinal endoscopy Nurse Clinical practice
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献102

  • 1Facione PA, Facione NC, Giancario CAF. The California critical thinking disposition inventory, CCTDI scoring supplement. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press, 2000. 被引量:1
  • 2Facione PA, Facione NC. The California critical thinking disposition inventory (CCTDI). Test administration manual. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press, 1992. 被引量:1
  • 3Ip WY, Lee DTF, Lee IFK, et al. Disposition towards critical thinking: a study of Chinese undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000, 32(1):84-90. 被引量:1
  • 4Yeh ML. Assessing the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the california critical thinking disposition inventory. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2002, 39(2):123-132. 被引量:1
  • 5Albert RT, Albert RE, Radsma J. Relationships among bilingualism, critical thinking ability, and critical thinking disposition. Journal of Professional Nursing, 2002, 18(4):220-229. 被引量:1
  • 6Chan S. The Chinese learner - a question of style. Education and Training, 1999, 41(6/7):294-304. 被引量:1
  • 7Gao G. ''Don't take my word for it.''- understanding Chinese speaking practices. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1998, 22(2):163-186. 被引量:1
  • 8Biggs J. Western misperceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture. In: Watkins DA, Biggs JB, eds. The Chinese learner: cultural, psychological, and contextual influences. Hong Kong and Australia: CERC and ACER, 1996. 45-67. 被引量:1
  • 9American Philosophical Association. Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The Delphi Report: Research findings and recommendations prepared for the committee on pre-college philosophy(ER 被引量:1
  • 10Pang MCS, Wong TKS, Ho SCJ. Changing economics and health worker training in modern China. The Yale-China Health Journal, 2002, 1: 61-84. 被引量:1

共引文献2068

同被引文献52

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部