摘要
快播公司传播淫秽物品牟利案的一审判决认定被告单位快播公司及王欣等人构成传播淫秽物品牟利罪,并对裁判理由做了阐述。快播公司之所以构成犯罪,首先在于其经营模式决定了快播公司具有网络视频软件提供者和网络视频内容管理者的双重角色。因此,快播公司对于网络存储的信息具有监管义务,但快播公司主管人员未能履行监管职责,导致淫秽视频在网上传播,并且两者之间存在刑法上的因果关系。这是一种不作为的传播,由此认定快播公司及其主管人员构成不作为的传播淫秽物品牟利罪。在《刑法修正案(九)》设立拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪以后,因为该罪与传播淫秽物品牟利罪之间存在竞合关系,仍然应当以传播淫秽物品牟利罪论处。
The judgement of the first instance trial of QVOD case of spreading obscene articles for profit convicts QVOD Company, Wang Xin and other of the crime of spreading obscene articles for profit, and also explains the rationale of the judgement. The reasons why QVOD Company is guilty of the crime are as follows： first, the operation model of QVOD Company has determined the dual role of QVOD both as the provider of internet video software and as the manager of the contents of internet video. Therefore, QVOD Company is obliged to supervise the information stored on the internet. Since it failed to fulfill this duty of supervision and therefore caused the spreading of obscene video on the internet, the causal connection between this omission and the result can be established. This is a spreading by omission and therefore QVOD Company and its managers should be convicted of the crime of spreading obscene articles for profit by omission. After the Ninth Amendment of Criminal Law introduced the new crime of refusing to fulfill the obligation of information network security management, the defendants in the QVOD case should still be convicted of the crime of spreading obscene articles for profit because of the concurrent relationship between these two crimes.
出处
《中外法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期7-28,共22页
Peking University Law Journal
关键词
快播公司
网络安全监管义务
传播淫秽物品牟利罪
QVOD Company
Obligation of Information Network Security Management
The Crime of Spreading Obscene Articles for Profit
