摘要
我国刑法采取不区分正犯与共犯的单一正犯体系,不能用区分正犯与共犯的区分制理论解释我国刑法关于轮奸的处罚规定。对有责任能力的人与无责任能力的人共同轮奸妇女的情形,并非只有按“共同犯罪是违法形态”的区分制的观念,才能得出合理的解释结论;将轮奸等同于共同正犯类型的强奸,用共同正犯的认定和处罚规则处理轮奸案件,不具有合理性与可行性;轮奸只存在成立与否的问题,不存在既遂与未遂形态。我国现行刑法将轮奸者作为强奸罪的加重犯处罚不具有科学合理性,有必要回到原有的按强奸罪基本犯从重处罚的模式。
Since the criminal law of china adopts the unitary system on principal offender which does not distinguish the perpetrator from the second participant,the theory on the system of distinguishing a second participant from a perpetrator can not be used to explain the provisions on punishment for gangrape in the criminal law of China.For a case that an actor with culpable capacity and an actor without culpable capability gang rape jointly commit the gang rape,a reasonable conclusion may be reached not necessarily based on the concept of the distinguishing-based system that"the joint crime is a form of unlawfulness".It is not reasonable and feasible to equate gang rape with co-offending rape and handle gang-rape cases according to rules on determining and punishing co-offenders.For gang rape,there is only an issue whether it is established,but whether it is completed or attempted.It is not of scientific reasonableness for the current criminal law of China to punish the gang rapers as aggregated offenders of the crime of rape,so it is necessary to return to the original mode of impose severer punishment on gang rapers according to the basic offense of the crime of rape.
出处
《政治与法律》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第6期37-54,共18页
Political Science and Law
关键词
轮奸
强奸
争议
处罚
正犯
共犯
Gang-rape
Rape
Controversy
Punishment
Principal Offender
Secondary Participant
