摘要
先发制人军事行动原則上应被禁止。但在极端情况下采取预先性自卫,已在国际上得到越来越多的响应,其可能的法律依据是联合国会员国或联合国机构对联合国宪章的解释实践。预防性军事行动由于明显缺乏国际法律依据,且这种对自卫权的扩大解释没有被国际社会绝大多数成员所接受,故仍应予以严禁。求助于联合国安理会应对国际恐怖威胁仍是一种最为可取的做法,为此各会员国有必要在武力使用的具体标准和程序问题上尽可能达成共识。
In general, pre - emptive military action should be prohibited. However, it seems to have got more and more international approval that anticipatory self - defence can be carried out at extreme conditions. The possible basis of this action may be the interpretation of the United Nations Charter by practice of the UN members or its organs. But the preventive military action should still be banned strictly because it evidently lacks the basis of international law and this broadened interpretation of self - defence has not been accepted by the majority of international community. Facing the threats of international terrorism, recourse to the UN Security Council is still a desirable solution. It is necessary for UN members to try the best to reach agreement on the specific criteria and procedure of the use of force.
出处
《法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第1期148-160,共13页
Chinese Journal of Law
基金
本文是国家社科基金项目<反对国际恐怖主义与国际法研究>(04BFX054)的成果。
关键词
国际恐怖主义
先发制人行动
预先性自卫
预防性军事行动
international terrorism, pre - emptive action, anticipatory self - defence, preventive military action
