摘要
民事公益诉讼入法的十余年间,司法实践的发展形态与立法者的设想并不完全一致。检察机关迅速在公益诉讼中处于一家独大的领导者角色,在起到积极作用的同时,也带来了一些可能的隐患。面向未来,应当区分民事公益诉讼的法律监督功能和纠纷解决功能,并根据两个功能配置不同的程序规定,在坚持检察机关主导诉前程序的同时,强化法院审判权在公益诉讼程序中的主导作用,以此实现从一家独大到双轮驱动的转变,更好地实现民事公益诉讼的价值和目的。
More than a decade has passed since the legislation on civil public interest litigation.However,the development of judicial practice has not been fully in line with the legislator’s original vision.Procuratorial organs have rapidly become the single dominant leader in public interest litigation,which has played a positive role but also brought some hidden risks.Looking ahead,the functions of legal supervision and dispute resolution in civil public interest litigation should be distinguished,and different procedural rules should be established according to these two functions.While insisting on the leading role of procuratorial organs in the pre-litigation stage,judicial organs should be strengthened to play a leading role in the trial stage of public interest litigation,so as to realize the transition from a single dominant model to a model of two driving forces,and better realize the value and purpose underlying civil public interest litigation.
作者
刘哲玮
LIU Zhe-wei(Law School,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)
出处
《苏州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第3期86-98,共13页
Journal of Soochow University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国特色公益诉讼现代化的理论创新与实现机制研究”(项目编号:23&ZD164)的阶段性成果。
关键词
民事公益诉讼
检察机关
审判机关
法律监督
纠纷解决
civil litigation of public interest
procuratorial organs
judicial organs
judicial supervision
dispute resolution
