期刊文献+

检察公益“两诉”衔接机制探析——以“检察公益诉讼解释”的完善为切入 被引量:23

An Analysis of the Joint Mechanism of the Public Prosecutor's “Two Litigation” in Prosecutorial Organization——Based on the Improvement of “Interpretation of Prosecutor's Public Interest Litigation”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 民事公益诉讼与行政公益诉讼在内容和功能上大量重叠,但又各自具有不可替代的独特部分,故二者既不能当然并立,也不能绝对排斥,而应通过衔接机制在避免重复的情况下形成"互补"关系。为此,"检察公益诉讼解释"应增加"两诉衔接"一章,从诉前、诉中和诉后三阶段作出相应规定。 Civil public interest litigation and administrative public interest litigation overlap in content and function,but each has its own irreplaceable unique features. Therefore,neither of them can be combined with one another,nor can it be absolutely exclusive,but should form a"complementary"relationship instead of duplication through the joint mechanism of Two Litigation. To this end,in the"interpretation of the prosecution of public interest litigation"there should be a supplementary chapter of"joint mechanism of the two litigation",and make corresponding stipulations at different( before,during and after)litigation stages.
作者 巩固 GONG Gu(Guanghua Law School,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310018,China)
出处 《浙江工商大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第5期27-34,共8页 Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University
基金 中国法学会部级法学研究课题"绿色原则在民法分则中的制度化研究"[CLS(2017)C57] 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资助
关键词 民事公益诉讼 行政公益诉讼 检察机关 “两诉”衔接 civil public interest litigation administrative public interest litigation prosecution agency joint mechanismof Two Litigation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

共引文献67

同被引文献272

引证文献23

二级引证文献376

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部