摘要
ChatGPT等生成式人工智能在内容生成中已超越工具角色,而扮演创作者角色,我们无法延续1965年人工智能生成物可版权性世纪之问提出时的逻辑、诉诸解释论将其定位为人类创作的工具。对此,应从立法论重新考虑该世纪之问。具体而言,人工智能自主生成物不符合自然权利学说、激励说和投资说等版权正当性理论要求,缺乏获得版权保护的正当性;同时因可通过收取服务费等方式获得激励而缺少版权保护的必要性;因而在立法上不宜对其提供版权保护。考虑到生成式人工智能自主生成物在形式上既容易与人类作品相混淆、又可能因满足版权侵权构成要件而涉及到侵权责任的承担,著作权法在修法时也应当一并考虑。
Generative artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT has gone beyond the role of performer in content generation and played the role of creator,and we cannot continue the traditional logic when the century question of Al-generated works was raised,resorting to interpretative theory to position it as a human creation tool.In this regard,the question of this century should be reconsidered from the perspective of legislation.Specifically,the Al-generated works do not meet the theoretical requirements of the legitimacy of protecting works such as the theory of nature,incentive theory and investment theory,and lack the legitimacy of obtaining copyright protection.At the same time,the need for copyright protection is lacking due to incentives such as charging service fees.At the same time,given that Al-generated works are easy to be confused with human works in form,and also easy to meet the judicial requirements of copyright infringement,copyright law should also make cautious policy choices from the perspective of legislation.
出处
《南京社会科学》
北大核心
2023年第10期77-89,共13页
Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences
