摘要
随着大规模数据和算式的增长,以及算法的不断优化。围绕生成式AI的前景,存在着支持、反对、中立等不同态度,这些态度背后隐含着认知根源、经济考量和权利思考。立足于法律3.0的融贯性治理注重国家法律、行政规制和技术方案之间的融贯,为治理生成式AI提供了思路和方向。融贯性治理中的“融贯”,既是规范性融贯,强调法律规范的内在一致性和统一性,也是整体性融贯,强调将技术方案融入规范,进而使得技术方案与不同层级规范和引领这些规范的原则与价值得以融贯。在面对以GPT为代表的生成式AI时,可以尝试将AI和区块链作为技术方案对其进行治理,也可以通过自我规制和外在约束培育建设“有道德的”AI,还可以通过“市场+规则”助力生成式AI的发展。生成式AI所涉及的法律问题在现有的法律体系框架内基本能得到有效应对,对于它带来的现实、急迫且法律没有明确规定的问题,可以进行融贯性治理。
With the explosive growth of new technologies and resources,such as large-scale data sets,computing power and algorithms,the generative AI represented by GPT is developing rapidly.Around the prospect of generative AI,there are different attitudes such as support,opposition and neutrality,which imply cognitive roots,economic considerations and rights thinking.The coherent governance based on law 3.0 focuses on the coherence of national laws,administrative regulations and technical schemes,which provides ideas and directions for how to govern generative AI.The“coherence”in coherent governance is not only normative coherence,emphasizing the inherent consistency and unity of legal norms,but also holistic coherence,emphasizing the integration of technical schemes into norms,so that the technical schemes can be integrated with different levels of norms and the principles and values that lead to these norms.In the face of generative AI represented by GPT,we can try to govern it through technical schemes,such as AI and block-chain,and build“ethical”AI through self-regulation and external constraints,and promote the development of generative AI through“market+rules”.The legal issues involved in generative AI can be effectively dealt with within the framework of the existing legal system framework,and the problems brought about by generative AI,which are realistic,urgent and not clearly defined by law,can be governed in a coherence manner.
作者
郭春镇
GUO Chunzhen(Law School,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,China)
出处
《现代法学》
北大核心
2023年第3期88-107,共20页
Modern Law Science
基金
教育部首届新文科研究与改革实践项目“人工智能+实践型法治人才培养研究”(2021140076)。
