期刊文献+

面孔可信度评价的跨维度同化效应:社会经济地位调节下的内群体偏好不对称性 被引量:1

Cross-dimensional assimilation effect in facial trustworthiness evaluation:The asymmetry of in-group favoritism under the moderation of socioeconomic status
原文传递
导出
摘要 同维度背景对面孔社会评价的同化效应很常见.近期研究发现,面孔可信度评价会受被评价面孔的社会经济地位(socioeconomic status,SES)背景信息的影响而产生跨维度的同化效应.但同化效应相关研究通常未考虑被评价者和评价者之间的关系,因而尚不清楚这种跨维度的同化效应是否会受到评价者自身SES的影响.因此,本研究考察被评价面孔SES和评价者SES对面孔可信度评价的共同影响.结果表明,被评价面孔的高、低SES背景信息均对面孔可信度评价产生跨维度同化效应,且这种同化效应会受评价者自身SES的调节,表现为高、低SES评价者的内群体偏好存在不对称性,即只有低SES评价者表现出内群体偏好.这些结果启示,社会评价本质上也可能依赖于社会关系,其同化效应研究应该考虑评价者和被评价者的关系. It is common for within-dimensional assimilation effect in the social evaluation of faces under social context.Recent studies have also found a cross-dimensional assimilation effect in the facial trustworthiness evaluation with the socioeconomic status(SES)background information as social context.However,whether the SES of evaluators moderates this cross-dimensional assimilation effect remains unclear,since the relationship between evaluators and evaluatees has largely been ignored in studies of the assimilation effect.Therefore,the present study aimed to investigate whether the SES of evaluators moderates the impact of the SES background information for evaluated faces on facial trustworthiness evaluation,and thereby to explore the broader theoretical issue on the interaction between evaluator and evaluatee on assimilation effect.There were two phases in the experiment.In the first phase,participants completed a status-color association training task,to learn how to associate colored backgrounds(purple/blue)with different levels of SES(high-SES/low-SES).This was to enable the participants to accurately perceive the SES information of the evaluated faces based on the background color in the subsequent evaluative task.In the second phase,they completed a facial trustworthiness rating task that used a 100-point scale to evaluate the trustworthiness of the faces displayed on colored backgrounds indicating high-or low-SES(Thigh-SES/Tlow-SES).After that,the facial trustworthiness baseline(T0)was also measured by presenting participants the isolated faces without the colored backgrounds.The cross-dimensional assimilation effect of SES information of evaluated faces on facial trustworthiness(T_(change))was calculated as follows:T change=T_(high-SES)–T_(0)or T_(0)–T_(low-SES).One-sample t-test analysis revealed that the presence of high/low SES background information for the evaluated faces led to the evaluators’trustworthiness evaluation being closer to the faces’SES background information.That is,both the high
作者 王一漫 何婷婷 陈文锋 Yiman Wang;Tingting He;Wenfeng Chen(Department of Psychology,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
出处 《科学通报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第2期229-237,共9页 Chinese Science Bulletin
基金 中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金)(18XNLG10,19XNLG20) 中国人民大学“双一流”跨学科重大创新规划平台“哲学与认知科学交叉平台”项目资助。
关键词 社会经济地位 面孔可信度评价 同化效应 内群体偏好 socioeconomic status facial trustworthiness evaluation assimilation effect in-group favoritism
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献39

  • 1李培林.社会冲突与阶级意识当代中国社会矛盾研究[J].社会,2005,25(1):7-27. 被引量:170
  • 2连淑芳.内-外群体偏爱的内隐效应实验研究[J].心理科学,2005,28(1):93-95. 被引量:30
  • 3温芳芳,佐斌.评价单一态度对象的内隐社会认知测验方法[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):828-833. 被引量:49
  • 4Chen Y R, Brockner J, Chen X P. Individual- col- lective primacy and ingroup favoritism: Enhancement and protection effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2002, 38: 482-491. 被引量:1
  • 5Tajfel H, Turner J C. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson Hall, 1986: 7-24. 被引量:1
  • 6John T, Jost B W, Pelham M R, et al. Non-con- scious forms of system justification : Cognitive, affec- tive, and behavioral preferences for higher status Groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2002, 8(17): 586-602. 被引量:1
  • 7Jost J T, Burgess D. Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2000, 26: 293-305. 被引量:1
  • 8Ashburn N J, Johnson N J. Implicit outgroup fa- voritism and intergroup judgment: The moderating role of stereotypic context. Social Justice Research, 2008, 21(4) : 490-508. 被引量:1
  • 9Karpinski A, Steinman R B. The single category im- plicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2006, 91(1): 16-32. 被引量:1
  • 10Osgood C E, Suci G J, Tannenbaum P H. The mea- surement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illi- nois Press, 1957. 被引量:1

共引文献19

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部