摘要
学术评价已经成为学术界和科技界关注的焦点。当前,我国学术评价中存在诸多问题,如评价体制与机制、评价标准与评价主体等问题,缺乏明确与科学的评价参照系是导致评价结果不科学、不客观的重要因素之一。评价参照系是一组与评价客体同质且相关的参照物集合。评价就是基于评价参照系对一组评价客体的比较。没有参照物,没有比较,评价结果就毫无意义。评价参照系的构建受到评价活动主体的视阈与价值导向、评价客体自身的属性和评价主体的视阈与认知能力等多种因素的影响,而在学术评价活动中常常被忽视,导致评价结果不够客观准确。从科学史和历史理解的评价范式来看,学术谱系具有学术评价参照系的一些基本功能,可以作为学术评价参照系的实例。学术谱系的构建,为评价参照系的建设提供了参考。
Academic evaluation has become the focus of both academic and scientific fields.Yet the problematic evaluation system, mechanism, standard, and subject, and the lack of clear and scientific evaluation referential system lead to unscientific and unobjective evaluation results.The evaluation referential frame is defined as a set of referential matters homogeneous with the evaluated object, and evaluation is by definition the comparison of a group of evaluated objects based on the evaluation referential system.The evaluation results would be meaningless without reference or comparison.The construction of an evaluation referential system is influenced by many factors, for example, the attitude and cognitive ability of the subject who conducts the evaluation and the nature of the evaluated object.The ignorance of such construction in academic evaluation would inevitably lead to unobjective and inaccurate results.Viewed from the perspective of the history of science, academic genealogy is a useful reference for the construction of academic evaluation.
作者
索传军
张璇
李木子
SUO Chuanjun;ZHANG Xuan;LI Muzi(School of Information Resource Management,Renmin University of China)
出处
《中国人民大学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第4期180-190,共11页
Journal of Renmin University of China
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“数据驱动的学术评价范式研究”(21BTQ008)
中国人民大学科学基金项目“基于文献计量学的学术论文影响力分析与质量评价研究”(14XNI015)阶段性成果。
关键词
学术评价
评价参照系
影响因素
构建方法
学术谱系
Academic evaluation
Evaluation reference frame
Influencing factors
Construction methods
Academic genealogy
