摘要
随着人工智能自主创造技术的不断发展,人工智能对以“人类发明者中心主义”为基础的发明人制度发起挑战。激励理论是专利法存在的目的,从激励理论角度考察,期望激励理论、公平激励理论和成就激励理论奠定了发明人激励制度的内部基础。基于对激励理论的逐一分析,人工智能即使能够自主完成发明创造,也不是基于激励意识而产生的结果。有鉴于此,人工智能不能作为发明人与人类发明者并存于专利法之中。面对未来时代人工智能自主生成或辅助生成发明的可能性,我国应坚持现有的激励自然人作为发明人进行创造的立法目的,维护既有的自然人是发明人的制度体系。
With the continuous development of artificial intelligence self-creation technology,artificial intelligence challenges the inventor system based on"human inventor centrism".Incentive theory is the purpose of patent law,and from the perspective of incentive theory,expectation incentive theory,fair incentive theory and achievement incentive theory have laid the internal foundation of inventor's incentive system.Based on one-by-one analysis of incentive theo⁃ry,artificial intelligence is not the result of motivational consciousness,even if it can complete the invention on its own.In view of this,artificial intelligence cannot coexist as inventors with human inventors in patent law.Faced with the possibility of artificial intelligence generating independently or assisting in the creation of inventions in the coming era,China should adhere to the existing legislative purpose of encouraging natural persons to create as inventors and maintain the institutional system of existing natural persons as inventors.
作者
曹新明
马子斌
Cao Xinming;Ma Zibin(Center for Intellectual Property Research,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)
出处
《科技与法律(中英文)》
CSSCI
2021年第2期42-50,共9页
Science Technology and Law(Chinese-English Version)
基金
高等学校学科创新引智计划(111计划)资助(B18058)。
关键词
人工智能
专利法
发明人资格
激励理论
artificial intelligence
patent law
inventor qualification
incentive theory