摘要
职务违法调查作为监察调查的重要内容,其目的在于查清事实,收集与职务违法行为相关的证据。对职务违法调查性质的研究不能脱离监察调查权,应承认其作为新型权力的正当性,并在监察法视阙下探究其自身规律和特点。《监察法》实施两周年来,职务违法调查活动亦面临诸多难题。职务违法调查的法律规制路径,应在明确调查措施的界限、完备程序控权的规则体系、强化外部监督方面一体推进。对职务违法调查证据规则的把脉,需区分程序性取证规则和实体性认定规则,前者与职务犯罪调查证据规则相似,后者则要以类型化为突破口,适用梯度化证明标准。
The purpose of duty-related violations investigation is finding out the facts and collect evidence. The research on the duty-related violations investigation should not be separated from the supervisory investigation, it should be recognized as a new power. Since the implementation of the Supervision Law, the investigation of duty-related violations has also faced many problems. The regulatory path of duty-related violations investigation should be promoted in clarifying the limits of investigation measures, perfecting the procedure rules system and strengthening external supervision. The rules of duty-related violations investigation evidences should be divided into procedural evidence rules and substantive identification rules. The former should be similar to the evidence rules of duty-related crimes investigation, while the latter standard of proof adopts as a gradient system.
出处
《法学评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第5期184-196,共13页
Law Review
关键词
职务违法
调查措施
比例原则
正当程序
证明标准
Duty-Related Violations
Investigation Measures
the Principle of Proportionality
Due Process
the Standard of Proof
