摘要
《监察法》出台以后,侦查程序和监察程序的分野使得监察调查活动收集到的证据材料无法顺利进入到刑事诉讼当中,从而产生监察证据与刑事证据的衔接问题。对此,《监察法》第33条第1款明确赋予监察证据进入刑事诉讼的资格,不需要刑事侦查机关重新取证。但相较于《刑事诉讼法》,《监察法》及其实施条例对于取证程序的规范要求显得过于粗疏,可以尽快转化和吸收刑事审判的程序标准来出台相应的监察证据细则。对于监察证据的排除规则,应当参考《刑事诉讼法》及相关司法解释,在第33条第3款的宽泛规定的基础上,构建和完善更为严格的非法监察证据排除规则。
After the promulgation of the“Supervision Law”,the division between the investigation procedure and the supervision procedure makes it impossible for the evidence materials collected by the supervisory investigation activities to enter into the criminal proceedings smoothly,resulting in the problem of the connection between the supervisory evidence and the criminal evidence.In this regard,Paragraph 1 of Article 33 of the“Supervision Law”clearly gives the supervisory evidence the qualification to enter criminal proceedings,and does not require the criminal investigation agency to collect evidence again.However,compared with the Criminal Procedure Law,the Supervision Law and its implementing regulations are too sloppy in the normative requirements for evidence collection procedures.It is possible to transform and absorb the procedural standards of criminal trials as soon as possible to issue corresponding rules of supervisory evidence.For the exclusion rules of supervisory evidence,the Criminal Procedure Law and relevant judicial interpretations should be referred to,and on the basis of the broad provisions of paragraph 3 of Article 33,stricter rules for the exclusion of illegal supervisory evidence should be constructed and improved.
作者
余鹏文
Yu Pengwen(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
出处
《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》
2022年第1期83-92,共10页
Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
基金
2020年“研究阐释党的十九届四中全会精神”国家社科基金重大项目“健全社会公平正义法治保障制度研究”(项目编号:20ZDA032)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
监察法
监察法实施条例
刑事诉讼法
监察证据
非法证据排除
Supervision Law
Implementation Regulations of Supervision Law
Criminal Procedure Law
supervisory evidence
exclusion of illegal evidence
