摘要
《监察法》的颁布实施意味着监察证据获得了独立的法律地位,将允许在刑事诉讼使用的证据种类从单纯的实物证据扩大至所有种类证据,其合法性审查判断标准亦将发生变化。此种转变有效契合了监察机关对职务犯罪调查权的法律属性,也符合"审判中心主义"的要求,为建立权威高效的国家监察体系奠定了证据基础。但由于《监察法》和《刑事诉讼法》在部分证据收集规则和证据使用规则上的差异,有可能导致相关规范在监察实务运行中失灵,故对监察机关收集证据的相关调查措施宜采用准用性规则进行规定。
The promulgation and implementation of the Supervision Law means that the supervisory evidence is separated from the administrative enforcement evidence and obtains an independent legal status.The supervisory evidence that could be used in criminal procedure has expanded from physical evidence to all kinds of evidence and its legality standard for judicial review also changed from administrative law to criminal procedure law. It lays the evidence system foundation for the establishment of an authoritative and efficient supervision authority. For the reason of evidence rules＇ between the supervision law and the criminal procedure law, it may lead to the failure of the certain regulations in the supervision of the practice. Therefore, it＇s necessary to regulate and adjust the relevant investigating measures by the referential norms rather than by itself.
出处
《中共中央党校学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第5期122-128,共7页
Journal of The Party School of The Central Committee of The C.T.C
基金
吉林大学廉政建设专项研究课题"纪检监察与刑事司法衔接机制研究"(2014LZY017)
中央高校基本科研经费项目"电子数据收集与认定实证研究"
关键词
监察证据
证据种类
审判中心主义
证据能力
Supervisory Evidence
Proof Category
Trial Centralism
Evidence Capability.
