摘要
根据中国2018年刑诉法规定,认罪认罚从宽案件的证明标准不能降低,这在很大程度上掣肘了认罪认罚从宽制度提升司法效率的制度初衷。在证明标准不能改变的前提下,可考虑构建差异化的证明方法体系。普通程序的案件适用“严格证明”方法,简易程序的案件适用“适当的证明”方法,速裁程序的案件适用“自由证明”方法,并按此顺序放宽对证据种类、证据调查程序和证据能力要求,从而提升认罪认罚从宽案件的处理效率。
Based on the 2018 criminal procedure law,the paper discusses the low efficiency in implementing the lenient system of pleaded guilty and recognized fine under the present standard of proof.To solve this,suggestions are made to construct a system of different methods of proof based on the principle of matching the litigation procedure designed according to the nature of different crimes procedures in China,and choosing different methods of proof,that is,the"rigorous proof method"for ordinary procedure,medium proof method for simple procedures,and"free proof method"for ordinary procedure.And according to the order,the requirements could be more fit to the type of evidence and evidence investigation procedures so as to raise the efficiency.
作者
樊崇义
徐歌旋
FAN Chongyi;XU Gexuan(National Institute of Legal Aid,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China;Collaborative Innovation Center of Judicial Civilization,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
出处
《北京工业大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2019年第5期44-50,共7页
Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
认罪认罚从宽
证明标准
严格证明
自由证明
适当的证明
the lenient system of pleaded guilty and recognized fine
standard of proof
rigorous proof method
free proof method
medium proof method
