摘要
为了保证在实体公正的前提下切实提高司法实效,有必要根据不同案情或适用程序区分认罪认罚案件的证明标准。认罪认罚由被追诉方撤回后,案件应及时转化普通程序或简易程序,被追诉人丧失“从宽”机会,之前认罪供述不得作为定罪量刑之依据。被追诉人仅能以违背“自愿性”、量刑过重以及事实认定错误为由提出上诉。
In order to improve the judicial effectiveness under the premise of entity justice,it is necessary to distinguish the proof standard of confession and acceptance of punishment according to different cases or applicable procedures.After the confession is withdrawn by the accused party,the case should be converted into ordinary procedure or summary procedure in time,the accused should lose the opportunity of leniency,and the prior confession shall not be used as the basis for conviction and sentencing.The accused can only appeal against voluntary,excessive sentencing and erroneous factual determination.
作者
刘文轩
LIU Wen-xuan(Law School,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350)
出处
《汕头大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
2019年第6期19-26,94,共9页
Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
认罪认罚从宽
证明标准
认罪认罚撤回权
上诉权
leniency of confession and acceptance of punishment
standard of proof
right of withdrawal
right of appeal
