期刊文献+

法律中的二八定理--基于被告人认罪案件审理的定量分析 被引量:65

The Pareto 80/20 Rule in Law : A Quantitative Analysis Based on the Hearing of Cases with Guilty Plea
原文传递
导出
摘要 在法律领域,特别是在诉讼解决领域,司法机关可以通过简化简单多数和优化复杂少数实现最优司法资源的配置。司法机关简化简单多数并不是简单地简化多数,更不是故意地忽略简单多数,而是要在保证法律主体基本权利的前提下,本着简化程序而不简化权利的原则来降低司法活动的边际成本,提高司法效率并促进司法公正。基于被告人认罪案件审理的定量分析结果,我国刑事司法领域通过简化简单多数来优化复杂少数的资源配置机制还有较大空间。2012年《刑事诉讼法》确认的被告人认罪案件简易程序的实施,需要充分保障被告人获得律师帮助,并提高侦查、起诉和审判等各个环节的司法效率,才能在整体上科学配置刑事司法资源并有效促进司法公正。 In the legal area , especially in the dispute settlement area such as litigation , the judiciary can optimize the allocation of judicial resources by streamlining the simple majority and optimizing the complex minority.Streamlining the simple majority by the judiciary is not to streamline the majority per se , nor is it to neglect the simple majority intentionally.Rather , it aims to reduce the marginal costs of judicial activities , improve judicial efficiency and promote judicial justice in accordance with the principle of simplifying procedures instead of rights , while guaranteeing the basic rights of legal subjects.Our quantitative analysis based on cases with guilty plea suggests that in the criminal judicial area , the Chinese resource allocation mechanism in which the complex minority is optimized through streamlining the simple majority still leaves much to be improved.To implement the summary procedures of cases with guilty plea as identified in the 2012 Criminal Procedure Law , it is essential to guarantee the lawyer's assistance to the defendant , and to improve the judicial efficiency of a number of links such as investigation , prosecution and judgment , so as to allocate criminal judicial resources and promote judicial justice in a more scientific and effective way.
作者 李本森
出处 《中国社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期85-105,205,共21页 Social Sciences in China
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Vilfredo Pareto, Oeuvres compldtes: Tome 3, Ecrits sur la courbe de la rkpartition de la richesse, Geneva, Droz, 1965, pp. 3-4. 被引量:1
  • 2Joseph M. Juran, " Pareto,Lorenz, Cournot, Bernoulli, Juran and others," Industrial Quality Control, vol. 17, no. 4. 1960, p.25. 被引量:1
  • 3Joseph M. Juran, Critical Evaluations in Business and Management, New York: Routledge, 2005. 被引量:1
  • 4理查德·波斯纳:《法律的经济分析》,蒋兆康译,北京:法律出版社,2012年,第593页. 被引量:1
  • 5William M. Landes, "An Economic Analysis of the Courts," Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 14, no. 1 (Apr. 1971), pp. 61-107. 被引量:1
  • 6Frank H. Easterbrook, "Criminal Procedure as a market System," The Journal of" Legal Studies, vol. 12, no.2 (Jun. 1983), pp.289-293, 309-331. 被引量:1
  • 7Mfiximo Langer, "From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: The Globalization of Plea Bargaining and the Americanization Thesis in Criminal Procedure," Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 45, no. 1 (Winter 2004), pp. 35-64. 被引量:1
  • 8Yehonatan Givati, "The Comparative Law and Economics of Plea Bargaining: Theory and Evidence," Discussion Paper No. 39, The Harvard John M. Olin Fellow' s Discussion Paper's Series, July 2011, http://www, law. harvard, edu/programs/olin _ center/. 被引量:1
  • 9陈卫东.公正和效率——我国刑事审判程序改革的两个目标[J].中国人民大学学报,2001,15(5):93-99. 被引量:55
  • 10陈瑞华.超期羁押问题的法律分析[J].人民检察,2000(9):4-8. 被引量:50

二级参考文献76

共引文献338

同被引文献846

引证文献65

二级引证文献831

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部