摘要
法律父爱主义在一定程度上可以从功效主义、自由主义和共同善的角度被正当化。从功效主义的视角看,某些父爱式的法律能够产生最大的功效,行为法律经济学的研究表明,默认规则等父爱式的规定甚至可以和自由至上主义者的观点兼容。从自由主义的视角看,某些父爱式的法律能够保护消极自由、积极自由和实质自由。从共同善的视角看,某些父爱式的法律有助于共同善的确认和保障,从而使社会有效和有序运转,让个人目标和价值实现。父爱主义应该以温和、审慎的方式施行。在功效最大化、个人自由和共同善发生冲突之时,应基于所处的"情境",根据它们与作为"基本权核心"的人性尊严之间的距离,经过正当的程序,以最小限制的方式来做出抉择。
Legal paternalism can be legitimated from the perspective of utilitarianism, liberalism and common good to some extent. From the perspective of utilitarianism, some paternalistic laws can have the best effects. The researches of behavioral law and economics show that the paternalistic rules like default rules even can be compatible with the opinions of libertarians. From the perspective of liberalism, some paternalistic laws can protect negative freedom, positive freedom and real freedom. From the perspective of common good, some paternalistic laws are conductive to the confirmation and guarantee of common good, so that the society can work effectively and orderly, personal purpose and value also can be realized. Paternalism should be performed in gentle and cautious manner. When utilitarianism, liberalism and common good are in confliction, it should make decisions with the minimal restriction way through proper procedures based on the distance between the three and human dignity.
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第6期75-82,158,共9页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金
国家社科项目《自媒体时代网络传言的法律治理研究》(项目号:12BFX002)
教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目《转型期积极权利的法律保障研究》(项目号10YJC820034)
中国博士后科学基金第四批特别资助项目的阶段性成果
国家留学基金委的资助
