期刊文献+

Autonomy in Scaffolding as Learning in Teacher-Student Negotiation of Meaning in a University EFL Classroom 被引量:6

高校外语课堂师生协商意义时支架式学习中自主性研究(英文)
原文传递
导出
摘要 Based upon sociocultural theory, this study investigates the dynamics of the teacher's roles and learner autonomy in the process of scaffolding in teacher-student negotiation of meaning in an EFL classroom, The participants were 25 undergraduate students and a Chinese teacher of English at a university in China. The teacher-student dialogue was the central mechanism mediating the construction of negotiation of meaning and form in language learning. The analysis of classroom discourse and the teacher's retrospection from an interview illustrated the teacher's different roles in interaction, where scaffolding acted as a structured pedagogical tool. The study revealed that the learners were afforded assistance to progress from other- regulation to self-regulation, and consequently, the teacher exploited opportunities to enhance learner autonomy in negotiation of spaces for autonomy in classroom teaching. The study has probed into the significance of the teacher's capacity of controlling scaffolding effectively and generated implications for teacher development and learner training. 本研究基于社会文化理论,探讨外语课堂教师搭建支架时的角色变化和学习者自主性的动态发展。通过跟踪考察25名大学生与其英语教师协商意义时的互动话语以及教师访谈话语,发现师生话语成为调节语言学习中构建意义协商的核心机制,教师运用支架作为系统教学工具在互动中扮演不同角色。研究揭示了当学习者从他人调控阶段向自我调控阶段发展时,教师利用课堂教学机会协商自主空间以推动学习者自主性的发展。本文还探究了教师如何有效控制支架的能力,对教师教育和学习者培训具有启示意义。
作者 李丹丽
机构地区 武汉大学
出处 《Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics》 SCIE 2017年第4期410-430,471,共22页 中国应用语言学(英文)
基金 supported by Hubei Provincial Educational Science Planned Project(No.2014B004) the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(No.413000004) supported by the Special Funds for Reform of Education and Teaching for the Central Universities(No.413200010)
关键词 AUTONOMY SCAFFOLDING teacher-student interaction REGULATION negotiation of meaning 自主性 支架 师生互动 调控 意义协商
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献106

  • 1Aljaafreh, A. & J. Lantolf. 1994. Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the Zone of Proximal Development [J]. The Modern Language Journal 78.- 465-483. 被引量:1
  • 2Donato, R. 1994. Collective scaffolding in second language learning [A]. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (eds.). Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Learning Research [C]. Norwood, N.J.:Ablex. 33-56. 被引量:1
  • 3Donato, R. & B. Adair-Hauck. 1992. Discourse perspectives on formal instruction [J]. Language Awareness 1 : 73-90. 被引量:1
  • 4Gallimore, R. &R. Tharp. 1990. Teaching mind in society: Teaching, schooling, and lit- erate discourse [A]. In L. Moll (ed.). Vygotsky and Education : Instructional Impli- cations and Applications of Sociohistorical Psychology [C]. Cambridge: CUP. 175-205. 被引量:1
  • 5Gibbons, P. 2003. Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom[J]. TESOL Quarterly 37: 247-273. 被引量:1
  • 6Hall, J. 2001. Methods for Teaching Foreign Languages [M]. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice- Hall. 被引量:1
  • 7Maybin, J., N. Mercer & B. Stierer. 1992. Scaffolding learning in the classroom[A]. In K. Norman (ed.). Thinking Voices: The Work of The National Oracy Project [C].London: Hodder and Stoughton. 186-195. 被引量:1
  • 8Nassaji, H. & M. Swain. 2000. A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles [J]. Language Awareness 9: 34-51. 被引量:1
  • 9Schinke-Llano, L. 1994. Linguistic accommodation with LEP and LD children [A]. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (eds.). Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Learning Research [C]. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex. 56-68. 被引量:1
  • 10Silliman, E., R. Bahr, J. Beasman&L. Wilkinson. 2000. Scaffolds for learning to read in an inclusion classroom [J].Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 31: 265-279. 被引量:1

共引文献85

同被引文献56

引证文献6

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部