期刊文献+

芬兰基础教育基于核心素养的科学课程标准探析 被引量:6

Analysis and Enlightenment of Key-competence-based National Science Curriculum Standards in Finnish Basic Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 探索基于核心素养的课程是当今世界各国基础教育课程改革的焦点,2016年芬兰实施的基础教育课程改革采用了在课程标准中设置核心素养的模式。芬兰学生在国际学生测评项目的科学科目中取得了举世瞩目的成绩,探析其国家科学课程标准,对我国基础教育基于核心素养的科学课程构建具有一定的参考价值。通过分析发现,芬兰科学课程标准具有如下特点:课程设计上实现了教学目标、教学内容和核心素养的整合,在核心素养的七大维度上更重视"思维和学会学习"素养、"信息技术"素养及"社会参与和可持续发展"素养的培养,课程内容上重视健康教育。 Exploring the key-competence- based curriculum system is the focus of curriculum reform in the world. In 2016, the basic education curriculum reforming in Finland adopted the key competence in the curriculum system. Through the analysis of Finland science curriculum standards, we find that the curriculum standard has the following characteristics: achieve the integration of teaching objectives, teaching content and key competence, highlight of developing the competences of the students' needs for lifelong learning and the competences of participation, involvement and building a sustainable future, pay attention to the health education. This has certain reference value for the reform of the basic education science curriculum in China.
作者 左成光 王俊民 杨东 ZUO Chengguang WANG Junmin YANG Dong
出处 《外国中小学教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第10期58-66,共9页 Primary & Secondary Schooling Abroad
基金 重庆市人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(项目批准号:16SKB032)资助
关键词 芬兰基础教育 核心素养 科学课程 Basic Education in Finnish Key Competences Science Curriculum
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献50

  • 1Alonzo,A.C.,&Steedle,J.T.(2009).Developingandassessingaforceandmotionlearningprogression.ScienceEducation,93(3),389-421.doi:10.1002/sce.20303. 被引量:1
  • 2Birchfield,D.,&Megowan-Romanowicz,C.(2009).EarthsciencelearninginSMALLab:Adesignexperimentformixedreality.InternationalJournalofComputer-SupportedCollaborativeLearning,4(4),403-421.doi:10.1007/s11412-009-9074-8. 被引量:1
  • 3Brooks,M.(2009).Drawing,visualisationandyoungchildren'sexplorationof"bigideas".InternationalJournalofScienceEducation,31(3),319-341. 被引量:1
  • 4Cavagnetto,A.R.(2010).ArgumenttoFosterScientificLiteracyAReviewofArgumentInterventionsinK"12ScienceContexts.ReviewofEducationalResearch,80(3),336-371. 被引量:1
  • 5Choi,A.,Notebaert,A.,Diaz,J.,&Hand,B.(2010).Examiningargumentsgeneratedbyyear5,7,and10studentsinscienceclassrooms.ResearchinScienceEducation,40(2),149-169. 被引量:1
  • 6Cooper,M.M.,Corley,L.M.,&Underwood,S.M.(2013).Aninvestigationofcollegechemistrystudents'understandingofstructure"propertyrelationships.JournalofResearchinScienceTeaching,50(6),699-721.doi:10.1002/tea.21093. 被引量:1
  • 7Dede,C.(2009).Immersiveinterfacesforengagementandlearning.Science,323(5910),66-69. 被引量:1
  • 8Duncan,R.G.,&Rivet,A.E.(2013).ScienceLearningProgressions.Science,339(6118),396-397.doi:10.1126/science.1228692. 被引量:1
  • 9Foong,C.-C.,&Daniel,E.G.(2013).Students'ArgumentationSkillsacrossTwoSocio-ScientificIssuesinaConfucianClassroom:Istransferpossible-InternationalJournalofScienceEducation,35(14),2331-2355. 被引量:1
  • 10Ioannidou,A.,Repenning,A.,Webb,D.,Keyser,D.,Luhn,L.,&Daetwyler,C.(2010).Mr.Vetro:ACollectiveSimulationforteachinghealthscience.InternationalJournalofComputer-SupportedCollaborativeLearning,5(2),141-166.doi:10.1007/s11412-010-9082-8. 被引量:1

同被引文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部