摘要
环境法上针对尾号限行的授权,并不足以支撑其正当性。因为这种"污染防治手段"事实上还具有"交通管制"与"物权限制"的效果。学界现有讨论集中于公权对私有财产权的限制问题,却忽略了尾号限行是针对"特定道路",而非"不特定车辆"作出的事实。对此,公物理论架起了机动车价值发挥与道路使用的桥梁,并逻辑自洽地将尾号限行的行为形式、内容、效果作为公物管理权的运作过程而纳入。如将尾号限行理解为"道路管理行为",则其合法性来自于国家对道路的所有权或《公路法》第8条第2款的概括性管理权。尽管这种正当性根据要受到"交通目的"的限制,但却是对基于"污染防治目的"作出的限行行为正当性的补充。
The authorization of the environmental law to the traffic restrictions based on the last digit of license plate numbers is not sufficient to support its legitimacy, because this restriction is not only an ‘instrument to control air pollution＇, but also effect of ‘traffic control＇ and ‘restriction on property right＇ in fact. The existing related discussions focus on restricting private property right by public right, while neglects the fact that the restriction is for ‘specific road＇ instead of ‘unspecified vehicles＇. For this, the public property theory acts as a bridge between motor vehicles＇ value exertion and road usage, and brings the behavior form, content and effect of the restriction under public property management right operation course logically. If the restriction is made of ‘road management behavior ＇, its legitimacy is from the state＇s ownership of road or the general management right directly granted by the article 8.2 of the Law of Road. Although such legitimacy is limited to ‘traffic purpose＇, it is the supplement to the legitimacy of the restriction behavior made according to ‘the pollution control purpose＇.
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第5期109-119,共11页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
基金
国家社科基金重大项目"加快建设法治政府的空间与路径研究"(14ZDC012)
关键词
尾号限行
道路管理
道路警察
公用变更
一般使用
Traffic Restrictions Based on the Last Digit of License Plate Numbers
Road Management
Road Police
Utilities Change
General Use
