期刊文献+

两种阿片类药物治疗癌痛的决策树分析 被引量:14

DECISION-MAKING TREE ANALYSIS OF TWO OPIOID DRUGS FOR TREATMENT OF CANCER PAIN
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:利用决策树模型评价盐酸羟考酮缓释片和硫酸吗啡缓释片治疗癌痛患者的成本-效果。方法:采用循证医学的方法搜集盐酸羟考酮缓释片与硫酸吗啡缓释片治疗癌痛的随机对照临床试验,进行Meta分析并得到相应的有效率及不良反应发生率,以决策树模型进行成本-效果分析。结果:癌痛患者使用盐酸羟考酮缓释片和硫酸吗啡缓释片治疗两周的成本-效果比分别为603.84、335.37,增量成本效果比为8003,敏感性分析后显示结果稳定。结论:硫酸吗啡缓释片治疗癌痛的成本-效果优于盐酸羟考酮缓释片。 Objective: Decision tree model was used to evaluate cost-effectiveness of sustained-release oxycodone and sustained-release morphine for treatment of cancer pain patients. Methods: Evidencebased medicine method was used to collect random clinical controlled trials for treatment of cancer pain with sustained-release oxycodone and sustained-release morphine. Meta analysis was performed to obtain effective rate and adverse effects rate, and cost-effectiveness analysis was performed with decision tree model. Results: After two weeks' treatment with sustained-release oxycodone and sustained-release morphine, cost-effectiveness ratio of the two groups were 603.84 and 335.37 respectively, incremental costeffectiveness ratio was 8003; sensitivity analysis showed that the results were stable. Conclusion: Cost effectiveness of sustained-release morphine for treatment of cancer pain was superior to that of sustainedrelease oxycodone.
出处 《中国疼痛医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2016年第6期448-453,共6页 Chinese Journal of Pain Medicine
基金 "十二五"国家科技支撑计划课题"安全合理用药评价和干预技术研究与应用"(2013BAI06B04)
关键词 药物经济学 决策树模型 癌痛 盐酸羟考酮缓释片 硫酸吗啡缓释片 Pharmacoeconomics Decision tree model Cancer pain Oxycodone Morphine
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1胡雁,陆箴琦主编..实用肿瘤护理[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2007:447.
  • 2Reid CM, Martin RM, Sterne JA, et al. Oxycodone for cancer-related pain: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med, 2006, 166(8): 837 - 843. 被引量:1
  • 3Jost L, Roila F. Management of cancer pain: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol, 2010,21 Suppl 5:v257 - 260. 被引量:1
  • 4Panchal S J, Muller-Schwefe P, Wurzelmann JI. Opioid- induced bowel dysfunction: prevalence, pathophysiology and burden. Int J Clin Pract, 2007, 61 (7): 1181- 1187. 被引量:1
  • 5Paulozzi LJ, Ryan GW. Opioid analgesics and rates of fatal drug poisoning in the United States. Am J Prev Med, 2006, 31(6): 506 - 511. 被引量:1
  • 6李小梅,李博,刘端祺,焦顺昌,肖文华.癌痛的阿片类药物治疗:EAPC基于循证医学证据的推荐[J].中国肿瘤临床,2012,29(21):1578-1587. 被引量:29
  • 7Cherny NI. The pharmacologic management of cancer pain. Oncology (Williston Park), 2004,18(12): 1499 1515; discussion 1516, 1520- 1491, 1522, 1524. 被引量:1
  • 8Ward A, Bozkaya D, Fleischmann J, et al. Modeling the economic and health consequences of managing chronic osteoarthritis pain with opioids in Germany: comparison of extended-release oxycodone and OROS hydromorphone. Curr Med Res Opin, 2007, 23(10): 2333 - 2345. 被引量:1
  • 9Hass B, Lungershausen J, Hertel N, et al. Cost-effective- ness of strong opioids focussing on the long-term effects of opioid-related fi'actures: a model approach. Eur J Health Econ, 2009, 10(3): 309 - 321. 被引量:1
  • 10Kwong W J, Ozer-Stillman I, Miller JD, et al. Cost- effectiveness analysis of tapentadol immediate release for the treatment of acute pain. Clin Ther, 2010,32(10): 1768 - 1781. 被引量:1

二级参考文献172

共引文献1120

同被引文献122

引证文献14

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部