期刊文献+

基于Clicker的交互式教学对科学推理能力的培养研究 被引量:3

Research on Cultivating Students'Scientific Reasoning Ability with Interactive Teaching Based on Clicker
下载PDF
导出
摘要 科学推理能力是当今物理教育研究和实践一个热点,但是教育研究往往更多的关注于科学推理能力的定量评估,极少涉及学生科学推理能力的培养和提高。利用课堂应答系统(Clicker),将传统的教学模式改为交互式、探究式的课堂新模式,并选取长江大学二年级理工科8个班级共237名学生进行了对比研究。结果表明,使用Clicker教学的4个班级科学推理能力成绩显著高于对照班级,基于Clicker的互动式教学模式有利于学生科学推理能力的发展和提高。 Scientific reasoning ability is an imperative area in the education practice and research. However,education researchers often pay more attention to the quantitative evaluation of scientific reasoning ability.To cultivate and improve studentsscientific reasoning ability is rarely involved.In this study,classroom response system('Clicker')is used to create a new interactive and inquiry class mode instead of traditional teaching mode,and 237sophomores of science and engineering(8classes) are enrolled and divided into control and experimental groups.The results show that scientific reasoning ability scores of the four classes which used the'Clicker'are significantly higher than that of the control classes.
出处 《长江大学学报(自科版)(上旬)》 CAS 2013年第12期91-93,6,共3页 JOURNAL OF YANGTZE UNIVERSITY (NATURAL SCIENCE EDITION) SCI & ENG
基金 长江大学教学研究项目(JY2012005)
关键词 课堂应答系统(Clicker) 交互式教学 科学推理能力 classroom response system interactive education scientific reasoning ability
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献72

  • 1Morrell.P.D.& Ledennan.N.G.1998.Students'attitudes toward school and classroom science:Are theydifferent phenomena? School Science and Mathematics.1998.98 (2):76-83. 被引量:1
  • 2Stuesy.C.Path Analysis:A Model for the Development of Scientific Reasoninghg Abilities in Adolescents.Journal of Researeh in Science Teaching 1984,26(1):41-53 被引量:1
  • 3Klahr,D.,& Dunbar,K,Dual search since during scientific reasoning.Cognitive Science.1988,12:1-48. 被引量:1
  • 4Klahr,D.Exploring science:.The cognition and development of discovery processes.Cambridge:MA:MIT Press,2000. 被引量:1
  • 5Keys,C.W.The Development of Scientific Reasoning Skills in Coniunotion with Collaborative Writing Assignments:An lnterprtive Study of Six Ninth-Grade Students Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1994.31(9):1003-1022. 被引量:1
  • 6Schauble.L.,Glaser.R.Duschl.R.A.,& Schtdze,S.Students' understanding of the objectives and procedures of expermentafion in the science classroom.Journal of the Learning Sciences.1995.4:131-166. 被引量:1
  • 7Siowiaczek.L.M..Klayman,J.,Sherman,S.J..Skov.R.B.information selection and use in hupothesis testing:What is a good question,and what is a good answer? Memory and Cognition,1992.20(4):392-405. 被引量:1
  • 8Hatano,G..& Inagaki,K.Young children's naive theory of bioiogy.Cognition.1994,56:171-188. 被引量:1
  • 9Miller,J.L..& Bartsch,K.The deveiopment of biological explanation:Are children vitalists? DevelopmentalPsychoingy.1997,33:156-164. 被引量:1
  • 10Hood,B.M.Gmvity does rule for falling events.Deveionmentai Science.1998,1:59-63. 被引量:1

共引文献75

同被引文献10

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部