摘要
国家秘密保护,是政府信息公开建设中不可回避的课题。规范分析显示,我国《保守国家秘密法》对于国家秘密,采取的是复合形式的认定结构,即只有既符合形式要件亦符合实质要件的事项,才能构成国家秘密。通过对5份涉及国家秘密公开案件的观察,折射出法院在司法审查标准、司法审查强度和司法审查方式上,对立法原意的偏离。两者之间的鸿沟,向我们揭示了修法之外的路径:重新解释涉及国家秘密公开案件的审查模式,以司法审查的完善,实现立法者预期的公开与保密之间的平衡。
State secret protection is an important and unavoidable issue in the development of government information disclosure. The normative analysis reveals that the Law on Guarding State Secret of the People＇s Republic of China designs a composite structure to confirm the state secrets. It means only the information which is accordance with substantive and procedural requirements can be deemed as the state secrets. However, the observation on five cases concerning state secrets displays that the deviation between the lawmaking purpose and the standards.of judicial review. This deviation shows there is an another approach to resolve the confliction rather than amending the law, which is to reinterpret the review model on the cases concerning the government information disclosure, and achieve the balance between the open and secret protection, which is expected by the lawmakers, by improving the judicial review.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第1期144-157,共14页
China Legal Science
基金
2012年度教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"<政府信息公开条例>的实施与改进"的阶段性成果
