摘要
本研究通过问卷调查与故事情景测查,对114名47.85～71.09个月的儿童在同伴冲突场景中使用的解决策略及其心理理论水平进行了研究。通过分析和对比,本研究发现使用协商、猜拳等策略的儿童心理理论水平较高,而使用控制和求助第三者策略的儿童心理理论水平较低。儿童对谦让策略的使用与其心理理论水平不相一致;无论是从同伴冲突解决策略家长问卷还是从对儿童的实际冲突解决策略测查来看,在解决冲突时,家长和儿童都倾向于选择"谦让""协商"策略;在儿童同伴冲突解决策略研究中,使用家长问卷调查的方法和通过故事场景对儿童进行实际测查的方法会得到不同的结果。
This thesis is about the strategies of children resolving the coflicts with their friends,and how affected by their theory of mind(ToM).We tested the 114 children by hypothesised conflict stories,and also tested their theory of mind.Then we questionnaired the parents of all the children about which stratigies their children will choose when conflicts happen.After analyzing and comparing all the data,we found children who choose negotiation and a finger-guessing game could get high ToM score,and children who choose domination and third party got low ToM score;Whether from the parents' questionnare or from the hypothesised conflict stories,parents and their children are apt to choose stratigies like obliging and negotiation;We would draw different conclusions about the resolving conflict stratiges from children and their parents.
出处
《学前教育研究》
北大核心
2011年第4期32-40,共9页
Studies in Early Childhood Education
基金
北京师范大学教育学部冯晓霞教授和日本名古屋大学教学学部氏家达夫教授合作研究的课题"儿童冲突管理技能发展过程的跨文化比较"的阶段性研究成果
关键词
儿童
冲突解决策略
心理理论
children,resolution strategies of peer conflict,theory-of-mind
