摘要
中国哲学史学科是哲学与历史学的交叉学科,有着还原历史与当代哲学建构两个向度。讨论“中国哲学学科合法性”问题,并不是绝对反对引用西方哲学来解释中国思想,而是指其对本属于以西方哲学为参照的和在西方哲学话语系统中言说的一种比较哲学研究范式缺乏自觉,并且质疑它把自身当作惟一具有正当性的范式的合法性。以哲学的方式叙述和整理中国传统思想,并不是理解和表述中国传统思想的恰当方式。而建立中国哲学史学科自身的话语系统,就是寻求恰当方式的重要步骤。在方法上,以“涤除玄览”暂时搁置种种西方哲学话语,以“虚壹而静”主观搁置种种解释学前见而深入和贴近传统文本,以字义一范畴研究审查和选择概念,是建立中国哲学自身话语系统的一种可能方法。
The discipline of Chinese philosophy history, as a cross-subject of philosophy and history, undertakes two tasks of reverting history and constructing contemporary philosophy. The discussion of 'Legitimacy of the Discipline of Chinese Philosophy ' does not absolutely mean that we oppose to use western philosophy to interpret Chinese traditional thoughts but that we lack the consciousness of the paradigm of comparative philosophy. It also helps us to oppugn if it is legal when this paradigm is considered as the only proper one. Narrating and rearranging Chinese traditional thoughts by western philosophical pattern is not the proper one to understand and express them. Constructing the discourse system of Chinese philosophy is an important step to construct proper patterns. Concerning the method, we can use 'clearing and getting rid of the unforeseen' to put different western philosophy discourse aside and use 'vacuity, unity and quiescence ' to lay various forecast aside in order to go deep into and press close to the text. Using 'word-category' to do research, check and choose concepts is a possible method to the construction.
出处
《中国人民大学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第4期69-76,共8页
Journal of Renmin University of China
关键词
中国哲学
话语系统
中国哲学学科合法性
the discipline of Chinese philosophy history
discourse system
legitimacy
