摘要
不当得利的举证责任如何在当事人间进行分配,我国法律及司法解释没有明确规定,学界亦缺乏深入研究,而司法实践中认识以及操作也不统一,争执的焦点集中在"无法律上的原因"由哪一方当事人举证上。借鉴域外关于不当得利举证责任分配的观点对于研究我国不当得利举证责任分配很有益处。不当得利举证责任的分配应该是:给付型不当得利由原告就取得利益无法律上的原因负举证责任,非给付型不当得利主要由被告就取得利益有法律上的原因负举证责任。
Law and judicial interpretation in China don’t tell us how to distribute the burden of proof of unjust enrichment between the parties clearly, and researchers in the mainland of China don’t study that in depth. Besides that, understanding of that as well as the operation in the judicial practice is not unified. The dispute focused on which party assumes the burden of proof of"no legal reasons". That knowing about several opinion of distribution of proof about unjust enrichment in other countries and areas is useful for us. Distribution of the burden of proof of unjust enrichment should be that the plaintiff assumes the burden of proof in payment unjust enrichment and defendant assumes the burden of proof in non-payment unjust enrichment.
出处
《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》
2009年第5期143-147,共5页
Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
关键词
不当得利
举证责任
分配
Unjust Enrichment
Burden of Proof
Distribution
