期刊文献+

如何保障博士培养质量?——美国四层次博士跟踪调查体系的研究与借鉴 被引量:4

How to Guarantee the Quality of Doctoral Education?——The Research and Reference of American Four-level Doctoral Tracking System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 如何提升博士培养质量、保持博士学位的核心竞争力是全球化时代世界各国面临的共同挑战。在此背景下,美国建立起由联邦政府、专业协会、研究学者和高等院校四层次组成的博士跟踪调查体系,覆盖博士培养和职业发展的全过程,囊括应届和往届博士在内的全体博士,包括从及时性评价到回溯性评价的全方位评价,具有全面性、系统性和持续性的特征,通过博士培养供给侧和需求侧的双重调节,构建了保障博士培养质量的内在机制。建议我国注重博士跟踪调查的全面性,建立全国性的博士调查机构;发挥研究学者的主动性,形成专业性的博士调查研究;突出院校研究的针对性,规范博士毕业生就业质量报告发布工作,以构建多层次博士跟踪调查系统,保障博士培养质量。 How to improve the quality of doctoral training and maintain the core competitiveness of doctoral degree is a common challenge faced by all countries in the world in the era of globalization.In this context,the United States has established a four-level doctoral follow-up survey system consisting of the federal government,professional associations,research scholars and institutions of higher learning,which covers the entire process of doctoral training and career development,including all current and previous doctors,including all-round evaluation from timely evaluation to retrospective evaluation,and with the characteristics of comprehensiveness,systematicness and sustainability.The internal mechanism to guarantee the quality of doctoral training is constructed through the dual adjustment of supply side and demand side of doctoral training.It is suggested that China should pay attention to the comprehensiveness of doctoral follow-up survey and establish a nationwide doctoral research institution,give full play to the initiative of research scholars to form professional doctoral research,highlight the pertinence of university research and standardize the publication of doctoral graduates’employment quality reports,so as to build a multi-level doctoral follow-up survey system to ensure the quality of doctoral graduates’employment.
作者 刘怡 刘晨光 Liu Yi;Liu Chenguang
机构地区 西北工业大学
出处 《国家教育行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第9期53-60,共8页 Journal of National Academy of Education Administration
基金 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2019M653755)
关键词 博士培养质量 博士调查 特征分析 Doctoral education quality Doctoral research Characteristics analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1沈文钦,王东芳,赵世奎.博士就业的多元化趋势及其政策应对——一个跨国比较的分析[J].教育学术月刊,2015(2):35-45. 被引量:69
  • 2赵炬明.中国大学与院校研究[J].高等教育研究,2005,26(8):1-14. 被引量:34
  • 3刘献君.论高校战略管理[J].高等教育研究,2006,27(2):1-7. 被引量:113
  • 4克拉克·克尔 陈学飞译.《大学的功用》[M].南昌:江西教育出版社,1993.. 被引量:4
  • 5Francis E. Rourke, Glenn E. Brooks. Yhe Managerial Revolution in Higher Education. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 1966.44. 被引量:1
  • 6JongAMuffo.《美国院校研究概述》[J].外国高等教育资料,1994,. 被引量:1
  • 7胡森:《简明国际教育百科全书·教育管理》,教育科学出版社1992年版,第300页 被引量:1
  • 8Jong M. Lyons. Memorandum to a Newcomer to the filed Institutional Research[ EB/OL]. Florida: The Association for institutional Researeh, 1976. from http://www, airweb, org. 被引量:1
  • 9Marvir W. Peterson. The role of institutional research: from improvement to Redesign, New Directions for Institutional Research (NO, 104), San Francisco: Joss-Bass, 1999,83 - 84. 被引量:1
  • 10Saupejl, Montgomeryjr. The Nature and Role of Institutional Research: Memo to a College or University. Tallahassee, Fla. Association for Institutional Research, 1979,3,12. 被引量:1

共引文献45

同被引文献78

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部