摘要
一些人文社科博士生虽然产出颇丰,但成果质量堪忧,这表明他们并没有真科研悟性,而是受假科研悟性驱使。假科研悟性的本质是“悟”到科研符码与科研品位在人文社科研究中的表达性价值之后,以其助力发表更多论文的一种机会主义成功学。假科研悟性的产生可归咎于同行评价中结构性偏好差异的引导、广告与虚拟学术社区的不良浸染、博士生教育的失责三个原因。遏制假科研悟性的产生,应改进人文社科同行评价机制,自觉防范广告与虚拟学术社区的不良浸染,不忘求真初心。
Some doctoral students in humanities and social sciences could publish much,but their quality were questionable.It meant that they were driven by the fake research perspicacity.The essence of fake research perspicacity was an opportunistic success theory,that is to say,using the expressive value of research code and research taste to publish more.Its emergence should be attributed to such three causes as the structural preference differences in peer evaluation,advertising and virtual academic communities,and negligence of doctoral education.In order to curb the fake research perspicacity,it is necessary to reform the peer evaluation mechanism,resist the adverse infiltration from advertising and virtual academic communities,and remain the original aspiration of seeking truth.
作者
郭仕豪
余秀兰
GUO Shi-hao;YU Xiu-lan(Institute of Education,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,China)
出处
《高等教育研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第9期76-82,共7页
Journal of Higher Education
基金
国家社会科学基金(教育学)重点项目(AFA190009)
关键词
人文社科博士生
科研悟性
科研符码
科研品位
doctoral student in humanities and social sciences
research perspicacity
research code
research taste
