摘要
In this article,two cases of Standard Essential Patents,ruled by the Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China,are presented and analyzed.The first Chinese anti-suit injunction in SEP litigation appeared in the first case through the method of behavior preservation,and the second case illustrates a clear intent by the Chinese courts to compete for global royalty rate jurisdiction.With international concerns raised about these cases,it is proved that the anti-suit injunction cases in China do not show any abusive or illegal conduct.The worldwide anti-suit injunctions in China are granted legitimately with legal jurisdiction over the cases,sufficient legal grounds for behavior preservation with the nature of anti-suit injunctions,the necessity of granting worldwide injunctions,and suitable granting standards.Several pieces of advice are proposed for the future application of anti-suit injunctions,including improvements in the predictability of validity scope,consistency of implementation,and clarification of penalties.
文章研究了我国最高人民法院判决的两起标准必要专利案件。最高人民法院在案例一中通过行为保全方式实现了我国标准必要专利诉讼中禁诉令的突破,案例二则表明了我国法院争夺全球特许权使用费管辖权的明确意图。虽然我国的禁诉令引起了国际社会的诸多关注,但是通过分析可以发现我国禁诉令并没有被滥用或违反法律规定。我国禁诉令具有合法的管辖基础,禁诉令性质的行为保全有充分的法律依据,全球禁诉令的签发具有必要性且签发标准适当,因此具有合法性。建议我国在禁诉令的未来适用中进一步提升禁诉令效力范围的可预测性、实施的连贯性和处罚的明确性。
出处
《科技与法律（中英文）》
2025年第1期138-148,共11页
Science Technology and Law（Chinese-English Version）
基金
supported by 2022 Key Project of Hunan Provincial Department of Education Scientific Research:"Conflicts and Resolution between Anti-Suit Injunctions and Anti-Anti-Suit Injunctions in International SEPs"(22A0079)。
