摘要
借助斯蒂格勒对于“记忆工业”的思考,反向探索作为记忆对立面的“遗忘”与技术之间存在的复杂关系,可以发现,在哲学、感知学、社会学意义上,在技术的自我隐藏、感知的技术截除以及技术社会的集体隐形等层面,技术均呈现出事关“遗忘”的种种踪迹。继而与“记忆工业”共生的“遗忘工业”概念也有其现实所指,即“文化工业”中生产“遗忘客体”的隐秘机制。跳读与倍速、断章与挖坑、玩梗与弹幕这三组分属网络文艺消费、生产及交互的现象可以被视为“数字遗忘工业”运行机制的三种表现。其表明,数字技术“界面”与商业资本“平台”正在通过“遗忘机制”发挥效力,数字式的“遗忘”在涣散的状态、递归的循环以及压抑的遮蔽中被不断地再生产出来。反思“遗忘”在数字技术环境与网络文艺活动中的作用,指向了对当前数字主体生存价值与意义的人文关切。
With the help of Bernard Stiegler’s thinking about“Industrialization of Memory”,the complicated relationship between“forgetting”as the opposite of“memory”and technology can be found.In the philosophical,perceptual and sociological sense,the interception of perceived technology and collective invisibility of technological society and technology,in the aspects of self-concealment of technology,presents various traces related to“forgetting”.The concept of“Industrialization of Forgetting”which coexists with“Industrialization of Memory”also has its realistic meaning,that is,the secret mechanism of producing“forgetting objects”in“cultural industry”.Some new phenomena of consumption,production and interaction of network literature and art,such as skipping reading,making fragments and foreshadowing,and making meme and bullet screen comments,can be regarded as the operating mechanism of“digital industrialization of forgetting”.It shows that the“interface”of digital technology and the“platform”of commercial capital are exerting their effects through the“forgetting mechanism”,and the digital“forgetting”is constantly reproduced in the state of laxity,recursive cycle and repressed cover.Reflecting on the role of“forgetting”in digital technology environment and network literary activities points to the humanistic concern about the value of digital subject at present.
出处
《中国文艺评论》
2023年第9期83-94,I0003,共13页
China Literature and Art Criticism
基金
2022年度教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“网络文艺批评理论创新问题研究”(项目号:22JJD750030)的阶段性成果。
关键词
网络文艺
遗忘工业
斯蒂格勒
数字技术
network literature and art
industrialization of forgetting
Bernard Stiegler
digital technology
