摘要
疑难与技术是形而上学的边缘概念,对它们之间关系的探讨更是寥寥无几。斯蒂格勒的《技术与时间》通过解读美诺疑难和卢梭疑难指出,真理和原初状态在最初是缺失着的。人类最初所面对的问题是原初缺陷,人最初并不知晓真理,也没有生存繁衍的自足能力,因此既不存在苏格拉底的“真理”,也不存在卢梭意义上的“自然原初状态”。这一根本困境就是原初问题,即疑难,一切问题的问题,它标示了人的原初缺陷。作为对缺陷的替补,技术得以出场。因此,技术是对缺陷的替补,也是对疑难的回答。疑难由此和技术一并构成着“人”,构成了形而上学的根基。
Techne and aporie are two marginal conceptions in metaphysics,besides their relationship has been even less discussed.Through an interpretation to Meno's aporie and Rousseau's aporie,Stiegler's Le technique et le Temps illustrates that truth and originality are both absent originally.The original question that human-beings encounter is a kind of original default:in the state of origin,human-beings don't know truth and are not capable to live or reproduce.So there is neither Socratic truth nor Rousseau's"Originality of Nature".To give an interpretation to this point by questioning philosophy will result in this conclusion:this radical dilemma is the most original question to human beings,which is aporie that is the question of every question.Aporie identifies the original default of human beings.As the supplement of default,techne presents itself.So technéis a supplement of default and also the answer to aporie.Thus,technéand aporie both consist of so-called"human beings"and are fundamental to metaphysics.
作者
马雷
乔迎舟
MA Lei;QIAO Ying-zhou(School of Philosophy and Social Development,Huaqiao University,Xiamen 361021,China)
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
北大核心
2023年第7期3-8,共6页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“问题哲学理论前沿与理论创新研究”(18ZDA026)。
