期刊文献+

“辩以象道”——荀子论“辩”及其思想内涵探析

“Bian for Preaching Tao”:On Xunzi's Theory of“Bian”and Its Ideological Connotation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 异于孔、孟对“辩”的谨慎态度,荀子不仅直言“君子必辩”,还对“辩”自身作了理论反思。由后者出发,我们可以理解荀子之“辩”中伦理与逻辑之间的理论联系。荀子对“辩”的重视,从方式上看,源于势、刑等暴力手段的缺失,从目的上看则源于其维护礼义之道的需求,而后者与战国末期儒家学说面临的时代困境息息相关。对于君子而言,“辩”不仅是为了卫道,更有修身的意味在内,此即“必辩”之所在。也因如此,《荀子》中论及“论辩道德”,其中的部分内容至今仍值得参考。 Different from the cautious attitude of Confucius and Mencius towards“Bian”,Xunzi not only stated that“a gentleman must Bian”,but also made a theoretical reflection on“Bian”itself.Starting from the latter,we can understand the theoretical connection between ethics and logic in Xunzi's“Bian”.Xunzi's emphasis on“Bian”stems from the lack of violent means such as potential and punishment in terms of manner,and from the need to maintain the principles of etiquette and justice in terms of purpose.The latter is closely related to the era dilemma faced by Confucianism in the late Warring States period.For a gentleman,“Bian”is not only for defending the Tao,but also for cultivating one's moral integrity.This is where“must Bian”lies.Because of this,some of the content of“the morality of Bian”in Xunzi is still worth referring to today.
作者 马欣欣 MA Xinxin(School of Philosophy,Research Center for Value and Culture,Collaborative Innovation Center for Core Socialist Values,Beijing Normal University)
出处 《当代中国价值观研究》 2023年第4期60-68,共9页 Chinese Journal of Contemporary Values
关键词 荀子 君子必辩 论辩道德 Xunzi Bian a gentleman must Bian the morality of Bian
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1王楷..天然与修为荀子道德哲学的精神[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2011:305页.
  • 2曹峰著..中国古代“名”的政治思想研究[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2017.
  • 3董治安,郑杰文,魏代富整理..荀子汇校汇注附考说[M].南京:凤凰出版社,2018.
  • 4陈文洁著..荀子的辩说[M].北京:华夏出版社,2008:236.
  • 5孟凯.辩说与治辨:论荀子之“辩”[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2023,37(1):27-33. 被引量:1
  • 6郭齐勇,,吴根友..诸子学通论[M].北京:商务印书馆,2015:505页.

二级参考文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部