摘要
作为袭警罪的核心构成要件要素,对“暴力袭击”的解释涉及到罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪的区分问题,其重要性不言而喻。通过大量考察涉袭警罪的司法案例,发现司法实践对“暴力袭击”的认定存在行为定性规则不明确与行为程度认定规则不统一两个问题。对此,一方面,袭警罪的暴力内容应仅限于积极的身体动作,即只有对人民警察直接实施物理性暴力才能构成本罪的暴力,并且暴力以具有突袭性为必要。另一方面,必须通过袭警罪的保护法益甄别暴力袭警行为的可罚性,即该罪的主要保护法益是人民警察的人身安全,次要保护法益为人民警察公务的依法执行,因此达到刑罚必要性的暴力袭警行为必须侵害警察人身安全,且造成轻微伤以上结果,但不包括重伤及以上的情形。
As the core constituent elements of the crime of assault on police,the interpretation of violent assault involves the distinction between crime and non-crime,this crime and that crime,and its importance is self-evident.Through a large number of judicial cases involving assault on police,it is found that there are two problems in the identification of violent assault in judicial practice:the disorder of the qualitative rules of behavior and the disorder of the identification rules of the degree of behavior.In this regard,on the one hand,the violent content of the crime of assault on police should be limited to active physical actions,that is,only the direct physical violence against the police can constitute the violence of this crime,and the violence should be raid.On the other hand,it is necessary to distinguish the penalizability of violent assault on the police through the protection benefits of the crime of assault on the police,that is,the main protection benefits of the crime are the personal safety of the police,and the secondary protection benefits are the execution of the public duties of the police according to law.Therefore,the violent assault on the police that is necessary to achieve the punishment must violate the personal safety of the police and cause more than minor injuries.But not serious injuries or more.
作者
黄磊
HUANG Lei(School of Law,Guizhou Minzu University,Guiyang,Guizhou 550025,China)
出处
《贵州工程应用技术学院学报》
2023年第1期139-147,共9页
Journal of Guizhou University Of Engineering Science
关键词
袭警罪
暴力袭击
直接暴力
突袭性
Crime of Assault on Police
Violent Attack
Direct Violence
Raidness
