摘要
致力于在行政过程中通过理性商谈促成合作治理从而具有实质法治趋向的现代行政法立体式发展图景,蕴涵着“过程—效果”的行政裁量治理公法哲学旨趣,这一旨趣型塑了行政裁量“论证—可接受性”治理新机制的内核。“理性的可接受性”是行政裁量治理效果虽非唯一却行之有效的衡量标准:依其强式理论,行政裁量首要的是获得遵守理性论证规则的法律共同体内的多数接受;依其弱式理论,行政相对人及社会公众的可接受性也应予以重视。“理性的可接受性”的复式理论因此一方面具有更大的弹性和包容度,能回应行政的现实流变,一方面也契合行政法治的核心/最优的复合要求。而要获致“理性的可接受性”则要在裁量过程和司法审查中展开多阶、多元的论证。
The picture of the development of modern administrative law is to realize the cooperative governance through rational dialogue in administrative process,tending to substantive rule of law.There is the philosophical intention of“process-effect”in the governance of administrative discretion and it forms the core of“argumentation-acceptability”of the new mechanism.The“reasonable acceptability”is not unique but effective criteria on the effect of the governance of administrative discretion.According to the strong theory,the primary goal of the administrative discretion is to obtain the majority acceptance in the legal community that abides by the rules of rational argumentation.According to the weak theory,the acceptability of administrative counterpart and the public should also be taken seriously.Therefore the compound theory of“reasonable acceptability”could respond to the real change of administration with greater flexibility and tolerance,and correspond to the core/optimal compound requirements of administrative rule of law.To achieve“reasonable acceptability”,we should make multi-level and multi-disciplinary arguments in the discretion process and judicial review.
出处
《交大法学》
CSSCI
2022年第6期143-157,共15页
SJTU Law Review
基金
2019年教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“法经济学视角下企业社会责任(CSR)法律化的规则体系建构研究”(项目编号:19YJC820068)
2020年广东省普通高校青年创新人才类项目“突发公共事件背景下企业社会责任的制度化研究”(项目编号:2020WQNCX059)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
理性的可接受性
论证
行政裁量
治理
Reasonable Acceptability
Argumentation
Administrative Discretion
Governance
