摘要
"依法行政"该如何"依"才合法,实质上是一个法律论证的问题。行政行为的公定力,决定了行政执法法律论证的必要性,事先合理的法律论证可以在很大程度上减少执法冲突。要真正落实依法行政,就必须对拟实施的行政行为作出相应的论证。这种论证包括规范性论证、事实性论证、结论论证和执行论证四个方面。在执法论证过程中,应保障法律论证的逻辑有效性、结果可接受性和整体融贯性。
How to administrate according to law is essentially a question of legal reasoning. The presumptive legality of administrative behavior determines the necessity of administrative law enforcement and legal reasoning. Moreover, reasonable legal argumentation in advance can largely reduce the conflicts in law enforce- ment. Therefore, to implement the administration according to law, it is necessary to discuss a proposed administrative behavior. Whether it is normative and factual should be focused on. And whether the conclusion and law enforcement is legal should also be included. To be specific, the logical validity, result acceptability and integral coherence should be guaranteed in the process of the law enforcement reasoning.
出处
《理论学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第2期135-143,共9页
Theory Journal
基金
国家社科基金重点项目"法律论证逻辑研究--面向‘法治中国’建设的整合性和应用性研究"(项目编号:15AZX019)的阶段性成果
关键词
法律论证
行政执法
可接受性
应用研究
Legal reasoning
Administrative enforcement
Acceptability
Application research
