期刊文献+

华威大学教师学术评价指标的四维矩阵及其特点 被引量:5

Four-dimensional Matrix of the Academic Evaluation Criteria of the University of Warwick and Its Characteristics
原文传递
导出
摘要 将学术活动所产生的社会效益和影响力纳入学术评价指标体系,正在成为全球大学教师学术评价改革的新趋势。面对外部科研评价框架变革,英国华威大学积极调整其教师学术评价指标体系,在原有教学、科研和管理三维度的基础上,增设了影响力维度;构建了适用于不同学科、不同聘任序列教师的四维晋升标准矩阵,弹性统合学术评价中教师各项工作绩效的关系。华威大学的案例对“破五唯”背景下我国大学教师学术评价体系的改革具有借鉴意义:坚守学术本位,凭借教学科研创造社会效益;引入定性评价,强调学术活动的质量和成效;综合考虑不同序列教师发展特征,弹性统合评价维度;细化等级梯度,发挥学术评价的发展性功能。 There has been an ongoing global trend to incorporate academic activities’ social benefits and impact into academic evaluation systems in recent years. In response to changes in the national research evaluation framework, the University of Warwick upgraded its three-dimensional academic evaluation criteria that included teaching, research, and management by adding an “impact” dimension. Meanwhile, it constructed a matrix of academic promotion criteria that applied to faculty members in various disciplines and career pathways, which flexibly integrated academic performances on the four dimensions. The case of Warwick has certain referential significance and enlightenment for Chinese universities when reforming their internal academic evaluation to break the “five-only”.It is suggested to(1) stick to the academic criteria and encourage faculty members to create social impact through teaching and research,(2) introduce qualitative evaluation to highlight the quality and outcome of academic activities,(3) consider the dissimilarities of academic development in different career pathways and flexibly integrate evaluation dimensions, and(4) refine the grade gradient to highlight the developmental role of academic evaluation.
作者 李欢 杨希 LI Huan;YANG Xi(Faculty of Education,The University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong,China;School of Education,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai,200240)
出处 《清华大学教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第4期94-101,共8页 Tsinghua Journal of Education
基金 上海市2021年度“科技创新行动计划”软科学重点项目“聘任制度改革及其对青年科研人才创新的影响研究”(21692196700)。
关键词 学术评价指标 学术影响力评价 学术晋升标准 REF 英国 academic evaluation indicators academic impact evaluation academic promotion criteria REF the United Kingdom
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献74

共引文献299

同被引文献67

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部