摘要
历代《左传》学者借《左传》所诠释之义理,不同于《左传》自身之原初义理,因此有必要回溯到对《左传》原初义理之探究。这一工作应从三方面着力:其一,明确《左传》是以传事的方式传义,传事与传义不可分割;其二,彻底破除门户之见和学派之争,与《公羊传》《穀梁传》进行客观比较研究,以呈现《左传》独有的哲学思考与诠释方式;其三,对历代《左传》学之层累阐释过程进行解剖,尤其应在《左传》原初义、杜预义、孔颖达义之间做出区分。
Interpretation of Zuo Zhuan varies throughout history,widely deviating from the original texts.To probe into the original meaning of Zuo Zhuan,therefore,is a worthy endeavor scholars shall undertake.In order to achieve its goal,the present paper makes the following three proposals.First,we should understand that Zuo Zhuan transmits meaning in the way of narrating the event,and narrating the event and transmitting the meaning are interlocked and can not be separated one from the other.Second,remove the prejudices existing among different schools and camps,and objectively compare Zuo Zhuan,Gong Yang and Gu Liang with the aim to expose the unique philosophical thinking and interpretation mold of Zuo Zhuan.Third,analyze the layered interpretation accumulated in history,and to make a distinction among the meaning of Zuo Zhuan,the meaning of Du Yu and the meaning of Kong Yingda.
出处
《励耘学刊》
2022年第1期1-16,M0003,共17页
基金
中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目“《左传》释义学研究”,项目编号:2019M661396。
