期刊文献+

社会文化影响幼儿园课程变革的研究和启示 被引量:3

A Study on the Impact of Social Culture on the Changes in Early Childhood Curriculum and Its Implication
原文传递
导出
摘要 已有研究揭示了当代社会文化影响下幼儿园课程的发展路径和发展特点,即幼儿园对外来课程模式进行本土化改造,将不同课程模式的优点整合到原有实践中,实现课程融合。课程融合理论模型背后所反映的社会文化融合揭示了社会文化对幼儿园课程的影响机制:社会变革带来的文化冲突与文化融合是实现课程融合的外因;教师群体受中庸思维模式和外来价值观影响,采取平衡协调的方式解决课程系统内部的各种矛盾,是实现课程融合的内因。课程融合模型为建设中国特色学前教育事业提供了重要启示。 Using cultural-historical activity theory,some empirical studies have revealed the development ways and characteristics of kindergarten curriculum under the impact of current social culture,which means that kindergartens localize external curriculum models and integrate the advantages of different curriculum models into the existing ones.Social cultural integration behind curriculum integration theory models reveals the impact of social culture on early childhood curiculum:cultural conflicts and cultural integration brought by social changes are the external causes of curriculum integration;the internal cause is that teacher community is influenced by thinking model of the Mcan and forcign values,and uscs balanced coordination to solve the conficts within the curiculum system.Curiculum intcgration model provides significant implications for the construction of preschool education with Chinesc characteristics.
作者 曾越 杨伟鹏 Zeng Yue;Yang Weipeng(Department of Early Childhood Education,The Education University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong;College of Education,Wenzhou University,Wenzhou,325006)
出处 《幼儿教育》 2022年第9期39-43,共5页 Early Childhood Education
关键词 幼儿园课程 社会 文化 课程融合 carly childhood curriculum society culture curriculum integration
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献44

  • 1Illeris, K. (2011 a). How we learn: Learning and non-learning in school and beyond [ M ], Beijing: Education science press, 61-62. 被引量:1
  • 2Kuutti, A. (1996). Aetivity theory as a potential framework for hu- man-computer interaction research [J].In B.Anardi (Ed.), context and eonsciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 17-44. 被引量:1
  • 3Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one[J].Educational Researcher, 27, 4-13. 被引量:1
  • 4Lave, J. &Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripher- al participation [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 80. 被引量:1
  • 5Illeris, K. (2011b). How we learn: Learning and non-learning in school and beyond[M], Beijing: Education science press, 23-29. 被引量:1
  • 6Engestr6m, Y. & Sannino, A. (2010a) Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges[J]. Educational Re- search Review, Vo15, 1-24. 被引量:1
  • 7海伦.瑞恩博德.艾莉森.富勒,安妮.蒙罗著,匡英译.情境中的工作场所学习[M],北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2011:159. 被引量:2
  • 8Engestrom, Y. (2008).From Teams to Knots: Activity Theoretical Studies of Collaboration and Learning at Work [M].Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 100-101. 被引量:1
  • 9Daniels, H. (2001a).Vygotsky and Pedagogy[M]. Routledge Falmer, 94-95. 被引量:1
  • 10Engestrom, Y. (2009).Expansive learning: Toward an activity-theo- retical reconceptualization[J]. In Knud Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary Theories of Learning.Routledge press. 51-73. 被引量:1

共引文献104

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部