摘要
目的探讨“五位一体”教学法对小儿内科实习教学质量的影响。方法根据随机数表法,将2020年1月—2021年2月在本院小儿内科进行实习的78例实习生分为观察组和对照组,每组各39例。对照组采用常规教学法,观察组采用“五位一体”教学法。比较两组实习生理论知识和实践操作演练考核成绩、实习生对教学效果的评价以及患儿家属满意度评分。结果教学后观察组实习生理论知识和实践操作演练考核成绩均高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组实习生对教学效果的好评率高于对照组(P<0.05);教学后观察组患儿家属满意度评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论“五位一体”教学法可提升小儿内科实习生专业知识储备和实践操作能力,教学质量相对较高,在实习生实践过程中患儿家属也相对满意,建议在临床教学中推广应用。
Objective To explore the effect of“five-in-one”teaching method on the teaching quality of pediatric internal medicine practice.Methods With the random number table method,78 interns in the pediatric medicine department of our hospital from January 2020 to February 2021 were divided into observation group and control group,with 39 cases in each group.In the control group routine teaching method was adopted and the“five-in-one”teaching method was used in the observation group.The assessment results of theoretical knowledge and practical operation drills,the evaluation of teaching effect by interns,and the satisfaction rate of children’s families were compared between the two groups.Results After teaching,the interns in the observation group had better performance in the theoretical knowledge and practical operation drills than those in the control group(P<0.05).The rate of positive assessment by the interns in the observation group was higher than that in the control group(P<0.05);the satisfaction rate of the family members in the observation group was higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The“five-in-one”teaching method can improve the professional knowledge and practical operation capability of pediatric interns,with relatively higher teaching quality,and the family members of children patients are relatively more satisfied in the practice process of interns,so it is suggested to be popularized and applied in clinical teaching.
作者
杨三珍
陈炳强
YANG Sanzhen;CHEN Bingqiang(Gaozhou People’s Hospital,Gaozhou 525200,China)
出处
《现代医院》
2022年第2期297-299,共3页
Modern Hospitals
关键词
“五位一体”教学
小儿内科
实习
教学质量
考核
护理满意度
“Five-in-one”teaching
Pediatric medicine
Internship
Quality of teaching
Evaluation
Satisfaction rate with care
