期刊文献+

苏联解体的长时段考量——文明史视角的探讨 被引量:2

The Disintegration of the Soviet Union in the Longue Durée: Discussion from the Perspective of Civilization History
原文传递
导出
摘要 从文明史的长时段视角探讨苏联解体问题,不仅必要,且国内国际学界已有初步积累。第一,"比较-结构"方法是较早的尝试。也即,从不同历史时段条件下的多民族关系的聚合性、传统治理模式多大程度存在中介性协调机制、文明所处的区位独特性等方面差异,探视苏联解体的端倪。第二,世纪之交以来,帝国形态研究、作为文明现象的苏联总体研究、以及文明与地缘政治相互关系等领域的探讨,指出文明与帝国现象相交织,大陆性帝国中央权力式微与周边动荡的紧密关联,是导致帝国解体的重要因素;帝国抱负过大、内外挑战前所未有,则是其崩溃的经典式动因。至于把苏联现象作为一个文明单位来系统考察,观察多民族构建、思想文化与意识形态建设以及如何处理外部关系,乃为事关苏联前途的关键问题,而苏联解体也恰恰缘起于这三个重大问题。同时,文明演进过程始终难以离开各大文明间的相互激荡,如果说,苏联解体也反射着美欧等文明单位先后趋于衰落,那么古巴导弹危机、1968年捷克斯洛伐克事件、1979年入侵阿富汗这三大扩张则明显表明:帝国对外扩张与国内的体制改革进程存在着紧密的相互关联。改革停滞,无疑是导致苏联解体的诱因。第三,文明演进过程中思想史的传递、演绎,特别是若干关键范畴的承继与缺失,对文明发展具有何种意义?特别是文明结合部条件下,思想史演绎与体现为民族心理与行为特征的"极化"的文明结构这两者之间存在着何种关系?这些问题对研究俄文明与苏联解体间的关联性十分重要。尤其是对"适度"这一思想行为范畴的研讨,有利于剖视苏联解体的深层动因。第四,本质主义与非本质主义的文明研究方法似已并不限于纯学术讨论,开始参与新兴国家与既存霸权之间的合作与竞争过程。本文主张在尊重各自文明存在的客观� It is not only necessary but also possible to discuss the disintegration of the Soviet Union from the longue durée perspective of the history of civilization. First, the “comparison-structure” approach is an earlier attempt, that is, to explore the cohesion of multi-ethnic relations during different periods, to what extent there is an intermediary coordination mechanism in traditional governance models, and differences in such fields as locations of civilizations, and to seek clues of the disintegration of the Soviet Union. Second,since the turn of the century, the study of empire forms, the overall research of the Soviet Union as a civilization phenomenon and the discussion of relationship between civilization and geopolitics have all pointed out the intertwined linkage of civilization and empire phenomena. The close connection between the decline of central powers of continental empires and their neighbors’ turmoil directly led to the disintegration of empires. An empire’s excessive ambitions, unprecedented internal and external challenges are classic causes of its collapse. As for the systematic investigation into the Soviet phenomenon as a civilization unit,careful observation of the multi-ethnic, cultural and ideological construction and how to deal with external relations are key to the future of the Soviet Union. As a matter of fact, the disintegration of the Soviet Union is precisely due to these three issues. Meanwhile, the civilization could hardly evolve without mutual influences among civilizations. If the disintegration of the Soviet Union also reflects the successive decline of civilization units such as the United States and Europe, the three expansions namely the Cuban missile crisis, the Czechoslovak incident in 1968, and the invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 clearly show that an empire’s external expansion is closely related with its domestic system reform.The stagnation in reform is undoubtedly one cause which led to the disintegration of the Soviet Union. Third, what is the significan
作者 冯绍雷 Feng Shaolei
出处 《俄罗斯研究》 CSSCI 2021年第6期26-51,共26页 Russian Studies
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地华东师范大学俄罗斯研究中心基地重大项目“‘一带一路’与‘欧亚伙伴关系’对接中的中国定位与战略研究”(项目批准号:19JJD810001)的阶段性成果。
关键词 苏联解体 俄苏文明 帝国研究 文明研究 人类文明新形态 the Disintegration of the Soviet Union Russia-Soviet Civilization Empire Studies Civilization Studies A New Model for Human Advancement
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1(法)费尔南·布罗代尔著..文明史[M],2017.
  • 2(俄)维·费·沙波瓦洛夫(В.,Ф.,Шаповалов)著..俄罗斯文明的起源与意义[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2014:547.
  • 3(奥)波波·罗(Bobo,Lo)著,袁靖,傅莹译..孤独的帝国 俄罗斯与新世界无序[M].北京:中信出版社,2019:444.
  • 4(俄)E.T.盖达尔著,王尊贤译..帝国的消亡:当代俄罗斯的教训[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008:321.
  • 5费尔南·布罗代尔,(Braudel)著,常绍民译,冯棠译,张文英译,王明毅译..文明史 人类五千年文明的传承与交流[M].北京:中信出版社,2014:610.
  • 6Е.普里马科夫,贝文力.苏联为什么会终结?[J].俄罗斯研究,2011(5):25-39. 被引量:5
  • 7冯绍雷.当代俄罗斯外交研究的方法论刍议——基于主体、观念、结构与周期的考察[J].俄罗斯研究,2021(2):33-73. 被引量:6
  • 8C·卡拉-穆尔扎,施海杰(译),陈亚梅(译),贝文力(校),杨成(校).苏维埃制度崩溃原因的初步分析[J].俄罗斯研究,2011(5):40-58. 被引量:9
  • 9伊曼纽尔·沃勒斯坦..变化中的世界体系[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2016:286.
  • 10(美)雅克·巴尔赞著..从黎明到衰落 西方文化生活五百年,1500年至今[M],2018.

二级参考文献9

共引文献15

同被引文献23

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部