摘要
《民法典》新增人格权禁令条款,从而存在两套快速制止网络空间的人格权侵权机制,分别是人格权禁令机制和避风港机制。两套机制在救济主体、救济程序、申请难度、救济范围等方面存在诸多区别,如何有效分工,以实现协调适用是亟需探讨的问题。根据两套机制优势的不同,在分工上应以避风港机制为主,而人格权禁令机制则主要解决避风港机制难以发挥作用的纠纷,包括疑难纠纷和涉及多平台的重复侵权纠纷。要实现两套机制的有效分工,可从三个方面进行突破:一是立法上明确疑难纠纷由人格权禁令机制处理,二是人格权禁令程序可分为“阻断”和“停止侵权”两个步骤,三是提高网络服务提供者协助执行的效率。
The Civil Code of PRC has added the injunction of personality right which leads to two mechanisms that could quickly stop infringement of personality right in cyberspace:one of them is personality right injunction,and another is safe harbour mechanism.It is urgent to discuss how the two mechanisms cooperate with each other to achieve coordination and application.These two mechanisms differentiate in the aspects of relief subject,relief procedures,various difficulty of application,and scope of relief,etc,which means that each mechanism has its own merits.According to the different advantages of them,the safe harbour mechanism should play the leading role,while personality right injunction should act on difficult disputes and repeated infringement disputes involving multiple platforms.In order to realize the cooperation effectively,three aspects could be accounted:first,the difficult disputes should be handled by the injunction of personality right in legislation.Second,the procedure of personality right injunction can be divided into two steps:blocking and stopping infringement.Third,the efficiency of network service providers to assist the court to execute should be improved.
作者
姚志伟
周立勤
YAO Zhiwei;ZHOU Liqin(Institute of Rule of Law and Economic Development,Guangdong University of Finance and Economics,Guangzhou 510320,China;Law Science Research Center,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处
《西安交通大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第6期138-145,共8页
Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University：Social Sciences
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目(18VHJ011)。
关键词
《民法典》
人格权
网络服务
避风港机制
人格权禁令
Civil Code of PRC
personality rights
network services
safe harbour mechanism
personality right injunction
