摘要
全国统一外商投资立法目标是高水平开放。国内自贸区改革是启动新一轮立法考量的逻辑起点,国际中美、中欧双边投资谈判,以及新区域主义出现,让外商投资立法面临多向度外部压力。对此,中国外商投资立法采取"渐进双轨"立场:既借助于双边谈判接近或接轨于高水平标准,又通过签订区域性多边投资协定,构建新的亚太法律框架。在此基础上,外商投资立法取得许多如何实现高水平开放的主要共识,同时又在评估负面清单质量,以及知识产权、竞争中立、劳工标准等议题上,要在两类标准的"竞争性牵引"下科学合理设定立法衡量的基准,其出发点就是"指向中国现实的接轨",尤其在推动国际化城市治理上既适度承认中国元素的有效性又不对此过分强调。
The nationally unified Chinese foreign investment legislation goal is to open to a high level.China’s free trade zone reform is the logical starting point for launching a new round of legislative considerations.It suspends the implementation of the law,authorizes local legislation,and promotes policy entry into the law to provide legislative preparations in terms of entities and procedures.The China-US and China-Europe BIT Negotiations and the emergence of a series of neo-regionalism multilateral organizations owing to the US’s exit from TPP have caused the legislation of China’s foreign investment law to suffer from pressures of different attributes and various dimensions,under which strategy chances and challenges coexist.For the sake of weighing external pressure,a gradual dual-track position has been adopted in China’s legislation of foreign investment law.Therefore,BIT negotiations have been deeply utilized to facilitate China to keep pace with the world’s leading criteria within maximum limit.Simultaneously,in order to construct the neo-Asian-Pacific legal framework and enhance mutual openness and inclusiveness among member states,both the promotion of building FTAAP and China’s participation and support for RCEP have been taken advantage of.Based on the logic above,a main consensus on the adherence to high-level openness within the scope of China’s legislation of foreign investment law has been achieved.Meanwhile,with regard to issues including negative lists quality evaluation,intellectual property,competition neutrality,labor criteria,environment protection etc.,the legislation measurement criteria should be set scientifically and properly under the premise of obeying two categories of standards’competitive traction.The starting point of the logic above lies in factual gearing and potential leading pointing to Chinese national conditions,namely Chinese characteristics’efficiency should be moderately recognized based on the objective cognition that its uniqueness should not be overemphas
作者
杨力
Yang Li(Wisdom Court Research Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200030)
出处
《政法论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第4期48-58,共11页
Journal of Political Science and Law
基金
作者主持的国家社科基金重点项目“企业社会责任立法边界、范围及国外经验”(16AZD024)的阶段性成果
关键词
外商投资法
竞争性牵引
立法衡量基准
国际化城市治理
Foreign Investment Law
traction of competitive criteria
legislation measurement criteria
international urban governance
