期刊文献+

临床医师连带病耻感量表中文版在精神卫生专业人员中的信效度 被引量:2

Reliability and validity of the Chinese-version of the Clinician Associative Stigma Scale in mental health proffessionals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评估临床医师连带病耻感量表中文版(CASS-C)在精神卫生专业人员中的信效度。方法:翻译英文版CASS为CASS-C,并在广东地区5家精神专科医院对804名精神卫生专业人员进行评估。采用内部一致性、相关性分析、分半信度分析来评估量表的信度;采用探索性因子分析、验证性因子分析以评价量表的结构效度。采用t检验或者单因素方差分析CASS-C总分与受试者人口学资料的关系。结果:804名受试者CASS-C总分为(39.3±11.9);19个条目的总Cronbach'sα系数为0.92。各个条目分与总分相关系数r在0.50~0.69之间;斯皮曼-布朗公式计算CASS总分半相关系数r=0.87。探索性因子分析发现CASS-C 4个维度累积方差贡献率为63.3%;验证性因子分析发现4因子模型是合理的(χ2=3.301,P<0.001),拟合优度指数(GFI)=0.985,比较拟合指数(CFI)=0.926,近似误差均方根(RMSEA)=0.071。CASS-C总分在性别、受教育程度、职业、工作部门间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论:CASS-C具有良好的内部一致性和结构效度,可用于评估中国精神卫生专业人员相关病耻感水平。 Objective:To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Clinician Associative Stigma Scale(CASS)in mental health proffessionals.Method:The original CASS was translated into Chinese version(CASS-C).Total 804 mental health professionals in 5 psychiatric hospitals of Guangdong province were evaluated.The internal homogeneity of CASS,correlation coefficients between the CASS global and item scores and split-half was analyzed to evaluate the reliability of CASS.The exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to examine the factor structure of CASS.T-test and ANOVA were used to analyse the relationship between the CASS total score and the social-demographic data.Results:The total score of CASS among 804 subjects was(39.3±11.9).The Cronbach'sαcoefficient of CASS was 0.92 and the correlation coefficients between the CASS global and item scores were between 0.50 and 0.69.Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.87.Exploratory factor analysis showed that the cumulated variance contribution ratio of 4 dimensions of CASS-C was 63.3%,confirmatory factor analytic models fit the data well(χ2=3.301,P<0.001,GFI=0.985,CFI=0.926,RMSEA=0.071).The total scores of CASS-C were significantly different across the social-demographic data such as gender,education,profession,and work department(P<0.05 or P<0.01).Conclusion:The CASS-C has good internal homogeneity,with acceptable reliability and could be applicable to assessing the associative stigma to mental illness in Chinese mental health professionals.
作者 林晓鸣 张杰 余敏 孙彬 何红波 LIN Xiao-ming;ZHANG Jie;YU Min;SUN Bin;HE Hong-bo(the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University,Guangzhou 510370,China)
出处 《临床精神医学杂志》 2021年第1期50-53,共4页 Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
基金 广东省医学科学技术研究基金(B2020042)。
关键词 临床医师连带病耻感量表 精神卫生专业人员 信度 效度 clinician associative stigma scale mental health professional reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献43

共引文献62

同被引文献48

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部