期刊文献+

中国版10项目大五人格量表(TIPI-C)的信效度检验 被引量:60

Psychometric Properties of Ten-Item Personality Inventory in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究TIPI-C的信效度。方法共1130名被试参加了研究。结果 TIPI-C的5个分量表E、A、C、ES和O的内部一致性系数分别为0.67、0.60、0.64、0.62和0.64,2个月后重测信度分别为0.68、0.51、0.41、0.64和0.77;TIPI-C各个量表与NEO-FFI各个量表的效标效度分别为0.54、0.44、0.65、0.58和0.44,自评TIPI-C和他评TIPI-C的各个量表的相容效度为0.39、0.40、0.32、0.33和0.35。结论 TIPI-C可作为测量大五人格的可靠和有效的工具。 Objective To study the reliability and validity of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory in China(TIPI - C). Methods A total of 1130 students participated in this research. Results Internal consistency reliabilities of TIPI - C's subscales,that was E, A, C, ES and O ,were 0. 67 ,0. 60,0. 64 ,0. 62 and 0.64 respectively ,while the test-retest reliabilities 2 month after were 0.68,0.51,0.41,0.64 and O. 77. The factors of TIPI - C correlated with relevant dimensions of NEO - FFI, ie. 0.54 ( E ) ,0.44 ( A ) , 0.65 ( C ) , 0.58 ( ES ) and 0.44 (O)respectively, and the correlations between self-report's five factors and peer-report's of TIPI -C were 0.39(E) ,0.40(A) ,0.32 ( C ) ,0.33 (ES) and 0.35 ( O ). Conclusion TIPI - C has a good psychometric properties, which can be played to relevant research.
作者 李金德
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2013年第11期1688-1692,共5页 China Journal of Health Psychology
基金 2012年广西高校思政教育理论与实践立项课题(项目编号:2012MSZ023) 2012年广西新世纪高教教改课题资助(项目编号:2012JGA231) "大学生自杀问题的归因分析与干预对策研究"(编号:2012MSZ023)
关键词 中国版10项目大五人格量表 大五人格 中国版 心理评估 TIPI-C The Big Five Chiness vesion Psychological assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Goldberg L R. The development of markers for the Big - Five factor structure [ J ]. Psychological Assessment, 1992,4 ( 1 ) : 26-42. 被引量:1
  • 2Goldberg L R. An alternative" description of personality" :The big - five factor structure[ J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology; JOUR,1990,59 (6) :1216-1229. 被引量:1
  • 3John O P, Srivastava S. The Big Five trait taxonomy:History, measure- ment, and theoretical perspectives [ J ]. Handbook of Personality : Theory and Research, 1999,2 (4) : 102 -138. 被引量:1
  • 4Saucier G. Mini - markers : A brief version of Goldbergs unipolar Big - Five markers [ J ]. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1994,63 ( 3 ) : 506-516. 被引量:1
  • 5Muck P M, Hell B, Gosling S D. Construct validation of a short five -factor model instrument : A self - peer study on the German adaptation of the Ten - Item Personality Inventory ( TIPI - G ) [ J ]. European Journal of Psychological Assessment,2007,23 ( 3 ) : 166-175. 被引量:1
  • 6Gosling D S, Rentfrow J P, Swann J R. B W. A very brief measure of Lhe Big- Five personality domains [ J ]. Journal of Research in Person- ality,2003,37 ( 6 ) : 504-528. 被引量:1
  • 7Langford P H. A one - minute measure of the Big Five? Evaluating and abridging SharerS(1999a) Big Five markers [ J ]. Personality and Indi- vidual Differences ,2003,35 (5) : 1127-1140. 被引量:1
  • 8Woods S A, Hampson S E. Measuring the Big Five with single items using a bipolar response scale [ J ]. European Journal of Personality, 2005,19 ( 5 ) :373-390. 被引量:1
  • 9Burisch M. You don 1 always get what you pay for: Measuring depres- sion with short and simple versus long and sophisticated scales [ J ]. Journal of Research in Personality, 1984,18( 1 ) :81-98. 被引量:1
  • 10蔡欣岚.工作特性,人格特质与工作满意度之关系-以半导体业为例[D].台湾:国立中央大学,2001. 被引量:1

同被引文献611

引证文献60

二级引证文献242

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部