摘要
案件事实在司法裁判中呈现出不同的形态,无论是司法管辖的原初纠纷事实还是司法认定的证据事实和要件事实,都是经由司法活动建构的案件事实表达形式。成为裁判理由并记载于判决中的案件事实是一种作为陈述的案件事实。案件事实陈述是指导性案例运用及对后续裁判具有约束力的实际保障,是判断待判案件与指导性案例是否同案的逻辑起点和分析基准。案例指导的关键在于通过类比推理方法解决待判案件与指导性案例在事实方面的相同或类似问题。案件事实陈述可以为指导性案例的运用推理提供实质根据,它不仅为案件相同的司法认定准备了实质理由,而且为同类案件的可普遍化判断与评价贮存了实质事实因素。指导性案例的制作需要重视对案件事实的编撰,应以回归司法裁判的过程和场景为取向,从法律适用的视角构建出具有充实性内容的案件事实陈述。
The facts of the case show different forms in the judicial adjudication.Whether Original disputed facts,or judicially-confirmed evidence facts and element facts are all expression forms of case facts constructed by judicial activities.The fact of a case that becomes the judicial reason and is recorded in the judgment is a kind of case fact as a statement.As the practical guarantee of the application and the binding force on subsequent decisions of guiding cases,the statement of case facts is the logical starting point and analytical benchmark for judging whether the case to be judged and the guiding case are“the same case”.The key of case guidance is to solve identical or similar issues in facts between the case to be judged and the guiding case by analogical reasoning.The statement of case fact can provide the substantial basis for the application of guiding cases.It not only prepares the substantial reasons for determining identical cases,but also stores the substantial factual factors for general judgment and evaluation of similar cases.In making guiding cases,judicial organs should return to the process and scene of judicial adjudication,and construct the statement of case fact with sufficient content from the perspective of law application.
出处
《环球法律评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第5期38-51,共14页
Global Law Review
基金
作者主持的2016年度国家社会科学基金青年项目“法律适用视角下的指导性案例编撰方法研究”(16CFX005)的研究成果。
