期刊文献+

“拔尖计划”本科生的深度学习及其影响机制研究——基于全国12所“拔尖计划”高校的问卷调查 被引量:18

Research on the Deep Learning of“Top Talents Plan”Undergraduates and Its Influential Mechanism:Based on the Survey of 12“Top Talents Plan”Universities in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 在建设一流本科教育的时代进程中,"拔尖计划"本科生的学习质量,特别是深度学习状况备受关注。通过对全国12所"拔尖计划"高校的1610名"拔尖生"的问卷调查,发现"拔尖生"的深度学习表现优于一流大学建设高校本科生群体,但却弱于美国一流大学本科生群体,特别是在体现综合、创新等特质的深度学习的高阶性维度上落后明显;在影响机制上,"优质的讲授"对于"深度学习"中"知识的理解和掌握"这一基础性维度有更大的影响,而"互动教学"对于"深度学习"中"知识的综合和创新"这一高阶性维度的影响更大;在调节效应上,指向"求知和掌握知识"为目标的"学习取向"具有对"深度学习"更加显著的促发机制。在此基础上,我国高教界可以从明晰深度学习的质量标尺、优化深度学习的环境构建、激活深度学习的动力要素三个方面展开后续的改革探索与实践。 On the way of constructing the"first class undergraduate education"in China,"Top Talents Plan"undergraduates’learning quality(especially their performance of deep learning)has attracted great attention.Through the questionnaire survey of 1610"Top Talents Plan"undergraduates from 12 universities in China,we findthe following conclusions.Firstly,for the performance of deep learning,"Top Talents Plan"students are better thanthe general student group from Chinese first-class universities,but weaker than the general student group fromAmerican first-class universities,especially in the higher order dimensions of deep learning,such as synthesizinglearning,creative learning.Secondly,for the influential mechanism of deep learning,"good teaching"has greaterinfluence on the"knowledge understanding and grasping","interaction teaching"has greater influence on the"knowledge synthesizing and creating".Thirdly,for the conditional effect,the"learning orientation"which aims tothe"pursuit of knowledge and comprehension of knowledge"has significant accelerating catalytic effect on the deeplearning.Based on the above findings,we can consider the following suggestions of future practice,such as makingclear the quality scale of deep learning,optimizing the environment construction of deep learning,activating thedynamic elements of deep learning.
作者 吕林海 LV Linhai(Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093)
出处 《中国高教研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第3期30-38,共9页 China Higher Education Research
基金 国家社会科学基金教育学一般项目“‘创新驱动’战略背景下中国一流大学‘拔尖计划’本科生的深层学习研究”(BIA180169)的研究成果。
关键词 “拔尖计划” 深度学习 问卷调查 影响机制 "Top Talents Plan" deep learning questionnaire survey influential mechanism
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献91

  • 1潘云鹤,路甬祥,韩祯祥,吕维雪,吴健.拔尖创新人才培养二十年的探索与实践[J].中国大学教学,2005(11):21-23. 被引量:62
  • 2杨德广.培养拔尖创新人才应克服体制性和制度性障碍[J].中国高教研究,2006(12):12-14. 被引量:28
  • 3杨秀君.国外成就目标研究的新进展[J].心理科学,2007,30(3):755-757. 被引量:14
  • 4Biggs J.Student Approaches to Learning and Studying[R].Hawthorn,Vic.:Australian Council for Educational Research,1987. 被引量:1
  • 5Marton F,S(a)lj(o) R.Approaches to Learning[M] // Marton F et al.(eds).The Experience of Learning.Edinburgh:Scottish Academic Press,1984. 被引量:1
  • 6Ramsden P,Entwistle N J.Effects of Academic Departments on Students' Approaches to Studying[J].Br.J.Educ.Psychol.,1981,51:368-383. 被引量:1
  • 7Dart B C.Adult Learners' Metacognitive Behaviour in Higher Education[M] // Sutherland P (ed.).Adult Learning:A Reader.London:Kogan Page,1997:30-43. 被引量:1
  • 8Marton F,S(a)lj(o) R.On Qualitative Differences in Learning:I-Outcome and Process[J].Br.J.Educ.Psychol.,1976,46:4-11. 被引量:1
  • 9Wilson K L,Lizzio A,Ramsden P.The Development,Validation and Application of the Course Experience Questionnaire[J].Studies in Higher Education,1997,22:33-53. 被引量:1
  • 10Trigwell K,Prosser M.Improving the Quality of Student Learning:The Influence of Learning Context and Student Approaches to Learning on Learning Outcomes[J].Higher Education,1991,22(3):251-266. 被引量:1

共引文献185

同被引文献208

引证文献18

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部